International Defense Security & Technology Your trusted Source for News, Research and Analysis
Related Articles
Nuclear power is recognized for its high energy density and low carbon footprint, positioning it as a vital part of the international energy landscape. However, its potential has been limited due to various challenges, including geopolitical tensions, safety concerns, waste management, and proliferation issues.
Global Nuclear Reactor Landscape
As of now, approximately 440 nuclear reactors worldwide produce over 390 GWe of electricity, necessitating around 79,500 tonnes of uranium oxide concentrate annually. This amount includes the fuel required for new reactors coming online. Although global capacity is slowly growing, increased reactor efficiency has mitigated the demand for uranium. For instance, in Europe, uranium demand per kilowatt-hour has decreased by 25% over the last 50 years, thanks to technological advancements. Each new gigawatt of capacity typically requires about 150 tonnes of uranium annually, with initial fuel loads for new reactors demanding even higher amounts.
Looking to the future, the World Nuclear Association’s 2019 Nuclear Fuel Report anticipates a 26% increase in uranium demand between 2020 and 2030, driven by a 22% rise in reactor capacity. This growth is particularly evident in countries like Russia and China, which are investing in uranium mines globally, often prioritizing strategic partnerships over market pricing to secure their fuel supplies. Notable acquisitions, such as Russia’s ARMZ acquiring Uranium One, illustrate the lengths these nations are willing to go to ensure a stable uranium supply.
Despite its smaller carbon footprint compared to fossil fuels, nuclear energy faces significant challenges that hinder its widespread adoption. The handling of radioactive waste requires extreme caution, and the complex regulatory frameworks necessary for ensuring safety further complicate its deployment.The waste, while a much lower volume must be handled very carefully because of its radioactivity. Nuclear fuels require far more complicated systems to extract their energy, which calls for greater regulation. The long-term sustainability of nuclear fuel sources is another concern, particularly as the global demand for energy rises. However, reprocessing used nuclear fuel provides a promising solution. It not only enhances national energy security by recovering valuable fissile material but also significantly reduces the volume and toxicity of nuclear waste, offering a more sustainable approach to nuclear energy.
Peak Uranium and Resource Management
Peak uranium refers to the point when global uranium production reaches its highest level, after which, following the Hubbert peak theory, production begins an irreversible decline. While uranium has military applications, its predominant use is in energy generation through the nuclear fission of uranium-235 in reactors. The energy released by fissioning just one kilogram of uranium-235 is equivalent to millions of times the energy produced by an equal mass of chemical fuels, or the energy contained in about 2,700 tons of coal. However, uranium-235 constitutes only 0.7% of natural uranium, making it a finite and non-renewable resource, underscoring the need for careful management of this vital element.
Alternative Sources of Nuclear Fuel
In addition to newly mined uranium, several secondary sources can contribute to nuclear fuel supplies. These include:
- Recycled Uranium and Plutonium (MOX Fuel): A key feature of nuclear energy is the ability to reprocess used fuel to recover fissile and fertile materials. These materials can be recycled into mixed oxide (MOX) fuel for use in existing and future reactors. Several nations, including European countries, Russia, China, and Japan, have adopted reprocessing policies, viewing used fuel as a resource rather than waste. However, many other countries have yet to embrace this approach.
- Re-enriched Depleted Uranium Tails: Depleted uranium, a byproduct of the enrichment process, can be re-enriched and reused as nuclear fuel, further extending the lifespan of uranium resources.
- Ex-Military Weapons-Grade Uranium: Weapons-grade uranium, highly enriched for military purposes, can be “blended down” to lower levels suitable for civilian nuclear reactors. For example, material that is 97% uranium-235 can be diluted at a ratio of about 25:1 with depleted uranium to create reactor-grade fuel at approximately 4% enrichment. Between 1999 and 2013, this process displaced nearly 10,000 tonnes of uranium ore (U3O8) production annually.
- Ex-Military Weapons-Grade Plutonium: This material can also be recycled into MOX fuel, contributing further to energy production and reducing the stockpiles of nuclear weapons materials
Understanding Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing
Nuclear fuel reprocessing is the chemical process that separates usable fissile materials—primarily uranium and plutonium—from spent nuclear fuel. This process allows for the recycling of these materials into new fuel, significantly extending the life cycle of nuclear resources. The reprocessing technique can vary, with methods like the PUREX (Plutonium Uranium Recovery by EXtraction) being widely used to extract valuable isotopes from used fuel.
Enhancing Energy Security
Resource Conservation: Reprocessing plays a crucial role in conserving valuable uranium resources. As global energy demand continues to rise, pressure on existing uranium supplies increases. By recycling used nuclear fuel, countries can significantly reduce their dependence on newly mined uranium, thereby enhancing their energy independence and extending the lifespan of their nuclear fuel reserves.
Domestic Fuel Supply: Countries with reprocessing capabilities can generate their own nuclear fuel, reducing reliance on foreign energy sources. This not only boosts energy security but also stabilizes energy prices and strengthens supply chains, which are increasingly vulnerable to disruptions from geopolitical tensions and market volatility.
Diversification of Energy Sources: Integrating reprocessed nuclear fuel into the energy portfolio promotes diversification, an essential step toward a low-carbon future. As nations aim to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels and transition to cleaner energy, reprocessed nuclear fuel offers a stable, reliable energy source that can complement intermittent renewable technologies like solar and wind.
Reducing Nuclear Waste
Minimizing Waste Volume: A key benefit of reprocessing is the significant reduction in the volume of high-level radioactive waste. By extracting reusable materials, the total amount of waste that requires long-term storage is substantially decreased. In some cases, reprocessing can reduce the waste from spent nuclear fuel by up to 90%, alleviating the burden on storage facilities.
Lowering Toxicity: Reprocessing also alters the isotopic composition of nuclear waste, making it less toxic over time. By separating long-lived isotopes such as plutonium-241 and americium-241, the remaining waste becomes less hazardous. This reduction in toxicity simplifies long-term waste management, easing the challenge of finding and maintaining safe storage solutions.
Advancing Waste Management Technologies: The reprocessing of nuclear fuel opens the door for advancements in waste management, such as the development of deep geological repositories. These specialized facilities are designed to securely contain and isolate the remaining waste from the environment for thousands of years, mitigating risks to human health and the ecosystem while ensuring safe, long-term disposal solutions.
Closing the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Over the past five decades, reprocessing spent fuel has been primarily driven by the goal of recovering unused plutonium and uranium, allowing nations to extract an additional 25-30% more energy from the original uranium. This process enhances energy security by closing the fuel cycle. Moreover, reprocessing significantly reduces the volume of high-level radioactive waste—by as much as 80%. The radioactivity of the remaining waste also diminishes more rapidly than that of spent fuel, making long-term waste management more manageable.
The Promise of Breeder Reactors
Breeder reactors, designed to generate more fissile material than they consume, could extend uranium reserves for thousands of years, positioning nuclear power as a sustainable energy source. However, despite substantial investments, commercial deployment of breeder reactors has faced hurdles. The recent success of Russia’s BN-800 reactor and China’s CFR-600 offers a glimpse into the potential of this technology. Though these reactors primarily generate electricity today, they can transition to produce new fuel as needed, thereby closing the fuel cycle and maximizing resource efficiency.
Advances in Reprocessing Technologies
Recent advancements in reprocessing technology, such as the development of pyrochemical methods in molten salts, are enhancing the efficiency and safety of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) recycling. Researchers at Ural Federal University are exploring the separation of actinides and lanthanides to recover uranium and plutonium effectively. This technology promises to improve the economic viability of breeder reactors and mitigate the challenges associated with radioactive waste.
The molten salt reactors being developed in Russia aim to transmute highly active fission products into less hazardous materials. This innovative approach, combined with existing methods like PUREX for low-level fuel, represents a significant step toward sustainable nuclear waste management.
Current and Future Reprocessing Capacity
Commercial reprocessing facilities are currently operational in France and Russia, with a combined capacity of around 2,000 tonnes of heavy metal (tHM) annually. The reactivation of Japan’s Rokkasho-Mura facility would add another 800 tHM to global capacity, and additional facilities are under construction in Russia and China. While smaller reprocessing plants operate in various countries, these efforts are already making a significant impact.
The Future: Fast Neutron Reactors and Depleted Uranium
The outlook for nuclear energy is set to change dramatically with the development of fourth-generation fast neutron reactors. These advanced reactors have the potential to use not only spent fuel from today’s reactors but also vast stockpiles of depleted uranium, which amounted to around 1.2 million tonnes by the end of 2018. This technological shift could render uranium mining far less critical, turning existing stockpiles into valuable energy resources and further reducing the environmental impact of nuclear power generation.
Addressing Public Concerns
While the benefits of reprocessing used nuclear fuel are substantial, public apprehension regarding nuclear safety and waste management remains a challenge. It is essential to foster transparent communication and educate the public about the advances in reprocessing technology and safety measures. Continuous improvements in safety protocols and regulatory frameworks can help alleviate concerns and build public trust in nuclear energy solutions.
Conclusion
Reprocessing used nuclear fuel represents a crucial step towards enhancing national energy security and reducing the environmental impact of nuclear waste. By recovering valuable fissile materials and minimizing the volume and toxicity of waste, reprocessing enhances the sustainability of nuclear energy. By reclaiming valuable resources and minimizing waste toxicity and volume, countries can create a more sustainable nuclear energy sector that meets growing energy demands while addressing environmental concerns. As the world increasingly shifts towards cleaner energy sources, the potential of nuclear power, supported by effective reprocessing technologies, cannot be overlooked.
Embracing reprocessing can pave the way for a future where nuclear energy is not only a significant part of the energy mix but also a responsible and sustainable solution for generations to come. Embracing reprocessing technologies can transform nuclear waste into a resource, ensuring that the benefits of nuclear power are maximized while addressing the pressing challenges of waste management and environmental sustainability. As countries invest in advanced technologies and strategic uranium partnerships, the nuclear power sector stands to play an increasingly prominent role in the global energy mix, offering a reliable, low-carbon solution for future generations.
Ural federal university: Scientists Discover a Technology For Reprocessing Nuclear Fuel
Scientists have obtained fundamental information useful for creating an advanced technology for reprocessing (regeneration) of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). With this technology, SNF can be reused in nuclear power plants (NPPs). This is extremely important, since the deposits of uranium – the main component of spent nuclear fuel – are small in nature. The discovery was made by chemists while working on the problem of separating actinides and lanthanides in chloride melts. An article about the research carried out and the results obtained was published in The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics.
The goal of the scientists is to develop a pyrochemical method for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel in molten salt with subsequent extraction and reuse of uranium and plutonium in nuclear reactors, including fast neutron reactors. The latter belong to actinides. To restore the nuclear-physical properties of the fuel, it is necessary to clean it from fission products that “interfere” with the process. First of all, these are lanthanides. It is also necessary to remove the most dangerous elements – cesium and technetium.
In this regard, chemists are studying the electrochemical and thermodynamic properties of cerium compounds – one of the main fission products from the group of lanthanides – in a melt of lithium and potassium chlorides of eutectic composition. Used as a solvent, this melt is economical and has a low melting point. The optimum operating temperature of the melt is 450–500 degrees Celcium: an increase in temperature leads to the volatility of lithium chloride, in addition, the corrosion resistance of equipment deteriorates and energy costs increase.
The significance of the research is explained by Valery Smolenskiy, Chief Researcher of the Laboratory of Radiochemistry of the Institute of High Temperatures of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Scientific Laboratory “Pyrochemical Technologies and Materials of a Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle” of the Ural Federal University and the Institute of High Temperatures of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
“During the operation of a nuclear power plant, as a result of nuclear reactions, various fragmentation elements are formed, which have different degrees of activity and life expectancy. The most dangerous of them are isotopes of cesium and other lanthanides, as well as technetium, molybdenum, tungsten, and a number of noble metals. Among the dangerous elements and minor actinides are neptunium, americium, curium. During the operation of a nuclear reactor, lanthanides form only a few percent of the fuel volume, but at the same time they are highly active, dangerous and are the so-called “neutron poisons”, that is, they absorb the neutron flux. This leads to a decrease in the efficiency and safety of the reactor, ”the scientist states.
According to Valery Smolensky, the regenerated spent nuclear fuel intended for reuse at nuclear power plants and loading into reactors must be “clean” and not contain debris. Therefore, uranium and plutonium, which are part of the fuel, must be separated from fission products, in particular from lanthanides, including cerium. In addition, in countries that actively generate and use atomic energy, including Russia, there is a problem of accumulating nuclear waste: their storage is dangerous and costly, and the possibilities for storage are limited. This is also the reason for the development of technologies for processing spent nuclear fuel in molten salt. In our country, the task of reprocessing nuclear waste is supposed to be solved by creating a molten salt reactor-afterburner, in which the highly active and most dangerous fission products will be transmuted into inactive or short-lived elements.
In Russia, the task of reprocessing nuclear waste is supposed to be solved by creating a molten salt reactor-afterburner, in which the highly active and most dangerous fission products will be transmuted into inactive or short-lived elements. For the processing of low-level fuel with a long holding time, the PUREX process is currently used, based on the use of hydrometallurgical methods. The regeneration of high-level fuel with a short holding time must be carried out in radiation-resistant media, such as salt and metal melts.
Currently, SNF reprocessing uses mainly MOX fuel for thermal reactors, consisting of uranium oxides or mixed oxides of uranium and plutonium. The resulting fission products are also present in MOX fuel mainly in the form of oxides. Therefore, in the process of regeneration, it is necessary to know both the electrochemical and thermodynamic properties of oxygen and anoxic compounds of fragmentation elements, including cerium.
References and Resources also include:
