The global aviation and defense industries face an urgent dual crisis: deep dependence on fossil fuels vulnerable to geopolitical shocks, and intensifying pressure to reduce carbon emissions. Aviation alone is responsible for 9–12% of U.S. transportation emissions, and military logistics remain tethered to price-volatile and environmentally damaging petrochemicals. This has driven an aggressive search for cleaner, more resilient fuel alternatives. Enter synthetic biology—the science of programming living cells like software—to convert biomass into high-performance fuels. As synthetic biology transitions from laboratory proof-of-concept to operational deployment, it promises a fundamental transformation in how we power aircraft carriers, drones, and even commercial jetliners.
The Petrochemical Crisis: Why Change is Non-Negotiable
Conventional hydrocarbon fuels are produced by distillation of crude oil. This process generates a variety of products including gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. However, these distillates include sulfur-containing and aromatic compounds that can lead to acid rain, engine corrosion, and particulate formation. This leads to lower performance and increased maintenance costs for the Military.
Conventional hydrocarbon fuels introduce serious vulnerabilities across the military and aviation sectors. Over 80% of critical petrochemicals are transported through geopolitically volatile maritime chokepoints, making fuel supply chains fragile and easily disrupted. Hydrazine, a staple rocket fuel for six decades, remains carcinogenic and hazardous to handle. The environmental toll is equally stark: aviation contributes roughly 1 billion tons of CO₂ annually, with military operations adding significantly to this burden. Compounding these issues are the performance constraints of fossil-derived jet fuels, which can underperform in extreme operational environments and offer diminishing returns in energy density.
Hydrazine-based propulsion systems are state-of-the-art for various applications ranging from launchers to large and small satellites. They have a long and successful heritage and a great variety of space-qualified, off-the-shelf components. Hydrazine has dominated the space industry as the choice of propellant for over six decades, due to its high-performance characteristics, despite its environmental and health hazards and the challenges faced in its manufacturing, storage, ground handling, and transportation.
Space agencies are trying to replace the conventional hydrazine rocket fuel, a highly toxic and carcinogenic chemical, with a greener propellant for future missions. These technologies present performance benefits such as reduced launch mass, increased scientific payload mass, and/or extending on-orbit lifetimes. The advantages are further reinforced due to the significant reduction in health risks encountered during launch site and ground handling operations.
Then there are synthetic fuels, which are produced by combining specific petrochemical molecules to generate fuel mixtures. Fuels of this type are typically expensive and methods to generate them can be carbon inefficient and energy-intensive.
Biofuels are fuels, which are chemically similar to gasoline and diesel, but are produced by processing crops, algae or microbial culture. The carbon in biofuels comes from carbon dioxide that plants convert to their biomass through photosynthesis. Traditional biofuels are produced from food crops. This approach is costly and competes with food production in the use of land, water, energy, and other environmental resources. Through the use of synthetic biology it has become possible to engineer microbial cell factories for efficient biofuel production in a more precise and efficient manner.
While early efforts explored crop-based biofuels, these posed new challenges. Crop-to-jet fuel pathways compete with food systems and require expansive tracts of arable land. The Royal Society estimates that meeting the UK’s net-zero aviation goals via biofuels would demand nearly half of its total farmland. Synthetic biology, in contrast, circumvents this by transforming microorganisms into living fuel refineries capable of converting waste streams, seawater, and even carbon dioxide into drop-in-ready fuels without the agricultural tradeoffs.
Engineering Microbes: The Biofuel Revolution’s Workforce
Synthetic biology is redefining the role of microbes, transforming them into programmable platforms for advanced fuel production. By embedding synthetic gene circuits into organisms such as Escherichia coli and Halomonas, researchers can rewire metabolic pathways to produce hydrocarbon molecules that closely resemble—or even outperform—those found in fossil fuels. These engineered microbes serve as self-replicating chemical factories, capable of operating in resource-constrained or austere environments, offering a highly adaptable and decentralized fuel synthesis solution.
The engineering of microorganisms plays a crucial role in biofuel production through synthetic biology. Researchers utilize tools such as genome editing and metabolic engineering to modify the genetic pathways responsible for fuel synthesis. This fine-tuning allows for the optimization of microorganisms’ ability to efficiently convert feedstocks into desired fuel molecules. Through targeted genetic modifications, scientists can enhance the production efficiency and yield of biofuels, making the process more economically viable.
In the aviation industry, synthetic biology is helping to address the carbon emissions associated with jet engines. Researchers are developing biofuels tailored for aviation that meet stringent standards. By genetically engineering microorganisms, they can optimize the production of fatty acids or isoprenoids, which can be converted into renewable jet fuels. This approach enables the sustainable production of biofuels with properties that match or exceed those of traditional fossil fuels.
Diesel engines are also benefiting from synthetic biology advancements in biofuel production. Biodiesel, a renewable alternative to petroleum-based diesel, can be produced from various feedstocks, including algae, plant oils, and waste fats. Through synthetic biology techniques, scientists can optimize the conversion of these feedstocks into fatty acid methyl esters (FAME), the primary components of biodiesel. By modifying the genetic makeup of microorganisms, they can enhance the yield, quality, and compatibility of biodiesel with existing diesel engines.
Biomanufacturing relies on bacteria and other microorganisms with modified DNA to produce materials that are costly or impossible to obtain otherwise, including high-energy chemical compounds used in explosives. Researchers have used the tools of synthetic biology to manipulate the genes of Escherichia coli, a common gut bacterium, so that it can chew up vegetation to produce diesel and other hydrocarbons.
E. coli is popular in genetic engineering because it is deeply studied and quite hardy, able to tolerate genetic changes well, says chemical engineer Jay Keasling of the University of California, Berkeley. Researchers have already modified E. coli to make medicines and chemicals, and now Keasling and his colleagues have turned the organisms into biodiesel factories.
The scientists first genetically modified E. coli to consume sugar and secrete engine-grade biodiesel, which can float to the top of a fermentation vat—no need for distilling, purifying or breaking cells open to get the oil out, as is the case for making biodiesel from algae. The use of biosynthetic fuels in jet and diesel engines can decrease costs, increase the range and fuel economy of aircraft, ground vehicles and ships, while reducing the emission of toxic particulates and resulting in lower net greenhouse gas emissions.
Synthetic biologists are attempting to get heterotrophic microbes (ones that can’t make their own food with photosynthesis but instead need to be fed with organic compounds) to convert the biomass from plants into usable fuels. Creating biofuels this way would then involve a two-step approach in producing the fuel, where plants are first engineered to grow as quickly as possible and then are ground up and fed to E. coli, yeast, etc., that would convert that biomass into ethanol and other fuels.
One of the most promising strategies harnesses waste biomass as a feedstock. Visolis, a synthetic biology company spun out of MIT, has pioneered the use of engineered microbes to ferment agricultural residues into mevalonic acid—a critical precursor for jet fuel, synthetic rubber, and various specialty chemicals. Notably, the Visolis platform is carbon-negative: it sequesters more CO₂ than it emits by locking plant-captured carbon into durable goods such as aircraft tires. This approach turns agricultural waste into high-value industrial products while contributing to decarbonization.
Biofuels could be made from bacteria that grow in seawater
Another significant breakthrough comes from the University of Manchester, where scientists have genetically modified Halomonas, a salt-tolerant bacterium, to convert seawater and sugar into jet fuel precursors. This innovation bypasses the need for freshwater inputs and leverages abundant marine resources, making it particularly attractive for operations in coastal, island, or off-grid regions where conventional infrastructure is lacking.
According to Professor Nigel Scrutton, Director of the Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, large-scale production of biofuels necessitates the use of robust microbial hosts cultivated on renewable waste biomass or industrial waste streams. The use of Halomonas fulfills these requirements, minimizing both capital and operational costs associated with the production of next-generation biofuels. Moreover, the jet fuel intermediates produced through this method are chemically identical to petrochemical-derived molecules, enabling their seamless integration into existing processes.
The implications of this research are significant for the biofuels industry as it presents a promising pathway towards more sustainable and economically viable bio-based jet fuels. By leveraging the capabilities of synthetic biology and harnessing the potential of bacteria found in seawater, researchers are paving the way for the development of renewable alternatives to traditional crude oil-based fuels.
Biofuel Alternative for Missile Propulsion
The U.S. military has taken a leading role in adopting microbial biofuel technologies. The U.S. Army’s Combat Capabilities Development Command has successfully engineered E. coli to biosynthesize BT (butanetriol), a key precursor to the Hellfire missile fuel BTTN, using corn husk waste as the feedstock. This approach not only slashes production costs—from over $30 per pound to under $19—but also mitigates supply chain risk by eliminating dependence on a single domestic supplier for critical propellants.
The U.S. military is turning to synthetic biology to produce advanced missile fuels using genetically engineered microbes. One of the most promising applications lies in the development of a bio-based alternative for BT, a key chemical precursor in Hellfire missile fuel (BTTN). Traditionally sourced from a single domestic petrochemical supplier at over $30 per pound, BT presents a significant logistical vulnerability and financial burden. To address this, researchers have successfully engineered E. coli bacteria to ferment corn husk fiber into high-purity BT, creating a renewable and potentially cost-effective pathway to fuel production. This effort, led by Dr. Peter Emanuel at the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC) Chemical Biological Center, exemplifies a broader push to reduce reliance on oil-derived specialty chemicals through biomanufacturing.
Located at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, the Army’s newly upgraded biomanufacturing facility uses fermentation tanks—akin to those found in commercial breweries—to grow microbes capable of converting agricultural waste into mission-critical compounds. The Hellfire missile program serves as a high-impact proof-of-concept. Given its importance in precision strikes and anti-armor missions, ensuring a resilient and scalable fuel supply is crucial. The current reliance on BT from petrochemical processes makes high-volume production economically unviable. A 2007 Navy-funded study at Michigan State University estimated that a shift to microbe-derived BT could reduce costs to below $19 per pound, with future improvements targeting the $15 per pound mark needed for viable mass production.
This biotechnology initiative also positions the U.S. to compete with China in strategic manufacturing domains. The Department of Defense’s investment—approximately $24 million over the next five years—will help scale up the bioproduction of BT and other specialty chemicals, offering not only supply chain resilience but also economic and environmental dividends. The use of E. coli to create BT from non-edible biomass like corn hulls offers a cleaner, domestically controlled, and less toxic alternative to petrochemical routes.
Beyond missile fuel, this project symbolizes a broader transformation in how the military sources critical materials. By embedding bioengineering into defense logistics, the Army can create on-demand chemical production capabilities—reducing dependence on volatile oil markets and geopolitically sensitive supply chains. As synthetic biology matures, this microbial manufacturing model could extend to other fuels, lubricants, polymers, and even battlefield medicines, laying the groundwork for a future where U.S. defense logistics are powered not by oil, but by engineered cells.
DARPA’s Living Foundries program
In parallel, DARPA’s Living Foundries program supported the development of BioRenewable-1 (BR-1), a next-generation fuel synthesized by engineered yeast. Developed collaboratively by Amyris and the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, BR-1 delivers a 19% improvement in energy density over conventional jet fuel. Its performance rivals that of JP-10, the high-energy synthetic fuel used in cruise missiles, but with the added benefits of biological production and scalability.
In a significant advancement for sustainable defense technology, the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) partnered with synthetic biology firm Amyris in 2020 to develop and test a high-energy biosynthetic fuel under DARPA’s Living Foundries: 1000 Molecules Program. The collaboration aimed to engineer yeast strains capable of producing complex hydrocarbon molecules, which were then refined into a biosynthetic jet fuel named BioRenewable-1 (BR-1). When tested in a turbine engine and a ramjet simulation system, BR-1 demonstrated up to 19% higher volumetric energy density than conventional jet fuel, matching the performance of JP-10, a premium synthetic fuel used in cruise missiles.
The successful testing of BR-1 not only validated the performance of biologically derived fuels but also opened the door to more cost-effective, resilient, and environmentally sustainable alternatives to petrochemical-based fuels. Using low-value inputs like yeast and sugar, this biosynthetic process offers a logistics advantage by reducing dependence on volatile oil supply chains and simplifying fuel sourcing during high-demand scenarios. As Dr. Anne Cheever of DARPA noted, biologically produced fuels could serve as vital supplements to traditional military-grade fuels, particularly in conflict zones where secure fuel delivery is a challenge. This project underscores synthetic biology’s growing role in modernizing military logistics and decarbonizing defense operations.
These innovations illustrate how synthetic biology is not just an alternative to fossil fuels—it’s a leap forward. By harnessing the metabolic flexibility of microbes, scientists are building a new generation of fuels that are cleaner, more efficient, and strategically resilient.
Breakthroughs Reshaping the Fuel Landscape
Recent advancements in synthetic biology have accelerated the transition from lab-scale research to real-world applications. In 2022, the Royal Air Force flew a drone powered entirely by synthetic kerosene produced by C3 Biotech using bacterial fermentation of food waste—a milestone for sustainable aviation. In 2022, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) committed $100 million to fund 11 cutting-edge projects aimed at developing next-generation biofuels for aviation. These projects span a diverse range of feedstocks, including algae, waste grease, and agricultural residues—materials that do not compete with food supply chains. The DOE’s investment reflects a broader effort to scale up drop-in biofuels that can seamlessly integrate into existing jet and diesel engines without requiring infrastructure overhauls.
In parallel, a joint team from Johns Hopkins University and the University of Alabama received $2.5 million from the Department of Energy to refine catalysts that convert ethanol into butene, a key jet fuel component. Using atomistic modeling, the team is optimizing catalyst lifespans and reaction efficiency for industrial-scale deployment.
The momentum carried into 2023 with bold regulatory action from the European Union, which announced a mandate requiring all jet fuel sold in member states to contain a minimum of 5% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) by 2030. This policy aims to accelerate the decarbonization of Europe’s aviation sector, which has been a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. In the same year, a landmark technical achievement was reached when a consortium—including Boeing, Airbus, and Shell—successfully powered a jet engine using 100% biofuel. This milestone not only demonstrates the feasibility of fully replacing conventional jet fuel but also signals growing industry readiness for widespread biofuel adoption.
Further advancing the frontier of biofuel science, researchers from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and UC Berkeley unveiled a breakthrough in microbial biomanufacturing. They engineered a strain of Streptomyces bacteria capable of performing “carbene transfer reactions”—a synthetic chemistry feat that was previously restricted to fossil-based processes. By using sugars as feedstock, the modified bacteria can produce valuable carbon-based intermediates for fuel and chemical production. This bio-based approach replaces costly and hazardous chemical inputs with a scalable, environmentally benign alternative, opening new pathways for low-emission manufacturing in energy, materials, and pharmaceuticals.
Synthetic Biology vs. Conventional Fuels: A Comparative View
Parameter |
Fossil-Based Fuels |
Crop Biofuels |
Synthetic Biology Fuels |
CO₂ Reduction |
0% |
50–70% |
70–100% (net-negative possible) |
Feedstock |
Crude oil |
Food crops |
Waste biomass, seawater, CO₂ |
Military Use Cases |
All vehicles, missiles |
Limited blending only |
Hellfire missiles (BT), jet fighters (BR-1) |
Cost (Production) |
$0.50–$1.00/lb |
$2.00–$4.00/lb |
Targeting <$1.50/lb by 2030 |
Operational Advantages: Beyond Sustainability
The advantages of synthetic biology-derived fuels extend well beyond carbon accounting. For the military, local production from agricultural or plastic waste enhances supply chain resilience—eliminating the need for fuel convoys that are often vulnerable to enemy attacks. In arctic conditions, these fuels outperform conventional ones by remaining stable below –30°C, improving mission reliability.
BR-1’s superior energy density offers a strategic edge: longer aircraft range or heavier payloads with the same fuel mass. Moreover, the use of biologically derived, non-toxic fuels replaces hazardous substances like hydrazine, protecting personnel and reducing environmental exposure during storage, transport, and use.
Scaling the Revolution: Challenges and Solutions
Despite its promise, synthetic biology for fuels faces several challenges. Catalyst durability remains a bottleneck, as materials degrade during extended operations. Johns Hopkins’ team is addressing this with AI-designed catalysts that resist thermal and chemical breakdown. Production scale is another constraint; current infrastructure cannot yet meet defense-level volumes. The U.S. Army has responded by investing $24 million in a biomanufacturing facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground, expected to produce bio-BT at scale by 2026.
Cost competitiveness remains a final hurdle. At roughly $19 per pound, bio-BT is nearing parity with the $15 per pound target. Advances in strain engineering—such as saltwater-based Halomonas platforms—may drive a 40% cost reduction by 2030, aided by lower input requirements and modular deployment models.
The Road Ahead: Defense Leads, Aviation Follows
Synthetic biology’s march into the fuel sector is following a defense-first trajectory. Between 2025 and 2027, the U.S. Department of Defense is expected to scale production of BR-1 and bio-BT, while the FAA finalizes certification of 100% synthetic fuels for civilian aviation. By 2030, with the EU’s 5% sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandate coming into effect, synthetic biology-derived fuels are expected to dominate that segment of the market. Looking further ahead to 2035, platforms like Visolis could be decarbonizing 30% or more of aviation and military logistics through scalable, waste-derived hydrocarbons.
As Dr. Benjamin Harvey of the Naval Air Warfare Center put it: “We’re beyond prototypes. Biosynthetic fuels now outperform fossils in energy density and cold tolerance—and soon will in cost.” In this emerging paradigm, energy is no longer a liability tethered to oil tankers and refineries. It becomes a digitally encoded, biologically executed system—produced wherever it’s needed, with the environmental footprint of a forest, not a pipeline.
Conclusion
Explore Further
References and Resources also include:
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/12/intestinal-fortitude-army-wants-make-missile-fuel-using-gut-bacteria.html
https://www.dvidshub.net/news/380278/nawcwd-amyris-collaborate-develop-test-high-energy-biosynthetic-fuel