Home / Technology / AI & IT / The Global AI Arms Race: Shaping the Future of Intelligent Warfare

The Global AI Arms Race: Shaping the Future of Intelligent Warfare

Introduction:

As technological advancements continue to reshape the landscape of warfare, the global arms race has taken on a new dimension with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a game-changer in modern warfare, offering nations the potential to revolutionize military operations and gain a decisive advantage on the battlefield.

Leading nations such as the United States, China, and Russia are investing heavily in AI technologies to gain an edge in intelligentized warfare. This race for dominance extends beyond traditional military capabilities, encompassing AI-driven operations and the development of AI-based weapons systems. This article explores the diverse applications of AI in military contexts, focusing on the advancements made by leading nations such as the United States, China, and Russia.

Understanding AI:

AI in warfare encompasses systems and technologies that simulate intelligent behavior, enabling computers to perform tasks traditionally requiring human intelligence. From visual perception and speech recognition to decision-making and translation, AI empowers military systems to operate with greater efficiency and autonomy.

AI is categorized into narrow AI, which specializes in specific tasks, and general AI, which possesses broader capabilities akin to human intelligence. While general AI remains a theoretical concept, narrow AI is already integrated into various military applications, enhancing capabilities across different domains of warfare.

The Strategic Importance of AI in Warfare:

A groundbreaking study from Harvard Kennedy School suggests that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize warfare on a scale comparable to the impact of nuclear weapons. As AI technology advances, its integration into military systems is becoming increasingly critical for modern warfare.

Compared to conventional systems, AI-equipped military systems possess the capability to efficiently process vast amounts of data. Moreover, AI enhances the self-control, self-regulation, and self-actuation of combat systems due to its inherent computing and decision-making capabilities.

The adoption of AI in military operations offers numerous advantages, including enhanced data processing, improved decision-making, and increased operational efficiency. Military systems equipped with AI can handle large volumes of data, improve situational awareness, and execute tasks with precision and speed.  Its ability to process vast amounts of data, analyze complex scenarios, and make rapid decisions in real-time offers significant advantages on the battlefield.

Military AI applications range from intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance to logistics, cyber operations, and autonomous vehicles. These systems augment human operators, enabling faster reaction times, improved data analysis, and the execution of complex missions in dynamic environments. From autonomous drones to intelligent command and control systems, AI is revolutionizing every aspect of modern warfare.

The RAND Corporation has outlined various AI applications with significant potential for military use. One notable suggestion is the replacement of frozen software with dynamic systems that do not require periodic refreshment, thereby creating more agile and cost-effective systems. AI can also be utilized in training scenarios, providing adaptive adversaries for fighter pilot training and enhancing combat readiness.

Another promising application of AI is in computer vision, which enables software to interpret photos and videos. This capability proves invaluable in processing extensive data from surveillance systems and conducting pattern-of-life surveillance, enhancing situational awareness on the battlefield.

AI has the potential to address numerous logistical challenges faced by the military, support war games, automate combat operations, expedite weapon development, optimize target identification, and distinguish combatants from non-combatants.

Currently, narrow AI technologies are being integrated into various military applications by the United States and its adversaries. These applications include intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; logistics; cyber operations; command and control; and semi-autonomous and autonomous vehicles.

The primary objective of these technologies is to augment or replace human operators, allowing them to focus on more complex tasks. AI-enabled systems offer several advantages, including faster reaction times, the ability to analyze vast amounts of data, and the facilitation of new operational concepts such as swarming. Swarming involves the autonomous coordination of unmanned vehicles to achieve a common objective, potentially overwhelming adversary defensive systems and providing a significant advantage on the battlefield, as highlighted in a US Congress report.

AI Enabling Autonomous Military Operations and Systems

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into military operations and systems is poised to revolutionize modern warfare, with implications comparable to the advent of nuclear weapons. AI applications, particularly in processing information, offer the potential to accelerate data interpretation processes, thereby liberating human resources for higher-level tasks. The future of intelligent warfare is expected to heavily rely on unmanned systems, which have the potential to significantly reduce the time between observation, judgment, decision, and action for combat units.

An exemplary initiative is Project Maven in the United States military, which aims to utilize algorithms for the rapid interpretation of imagery from drone surveillance feeds. This narrow AI application, with commercial parallels, could extend beyond image recognition to the processing of diverse datasets, including publicly available or classified information. By enhancing data interpretation speed and accuracy, AI applications have the potential to enhance decision-making capabilities in military settings.

The increasing pace of warfare, from hypersonic threats to cyber-attacks, underscores the urgency for AI integration. AI has the capacity to augment decision-making speed, as demonstrated in air defense scenarios where autonomous systems can react faster and more effectively than human operators. Additionally, AI contributes to the autonomy of air, ground, and underwater systems, enabling coordinated actions such as swarming tactics.

The US Army is actively pursuing the development and evaluation of robotic and AI technologies to enhance soldier decision-making capabilities by a factor of ten. Through manned-unmanned teaming, the army aims to integrate robotic ground, air, water, and virtual systems to bolster infantry platoons’ lethality, mobility, protection, and situational awareness. Moreover, AI tools are envisioned to empower platoon leaders and soldiers to process information rapidly and intuitively, enabling faster responses to dynamic battlefield conditions.

Military officials are exploring AI’s potential to predict the launch of nuclear missiles, utilizing computer programs to track and target mobile launchers in hostile territories. Successful research outcomes could enable AI systems to autonomously analyze vast datasets, including satellite imagery, to detect signs of impending missile launches, replicating intelligent human behavior with unprecedented efficiency.

Recent field tests have demonstrated the efficacy of experimental Army AI in identifying targets in satellite imagery and relaying coordinates to artillery units within seconds. While such advancements streamline the “kill chain” from detection to destruction, AI’s true potential lies in its ability to facilitate human-machine collaboration and optimize decision-making across the joint force.

In envisioning future AI applications, considerations extend beyond instantaneous response to target detection. AI readiness necessitates robust data flow management, compute resources for algorithm development, and customizable interfaces for edge users. Commanders must meticulously assess data requirements and leverage AI capabilities to navigate the complexity of modern warfare effectively.

As with any resource, data comes in diverse formats, requiring careful analysis and cross-referencing to inform decisive actions. AI solutions must integrate position data, timing data, threat location data, friendly force status data, weather data, and logistics data to provide commanders with comprehensive situational awareness and actionable insights.

In essence, AI’s transformative potential in military operations extends far beyond rapid response capabilities, encompassing holistic decision support systems that empower commanders to navigate dynamic and complex operational environments effectively. Through thoughtful integration and utilization, AI stands poised to reshape the future of warfare, enhancing both efficiency and effectiveness across the joint force.

 

Leading Players in the Global AI Arms Race:

AI has become a strategic imperative for nations seeking to maintain military superiority in an increasingly complex and contested global security environment. The United States, China, and Russia are at the forefront of the global AI arms race, investing significant resources in AI-driven military capabilities. From autonomous drones and intelligent surveillance systems to hypersonic missiles and swarming tactics, these nations are leveraging AI to redefine the nature of warfare.

The global race for artificial intelligence (AI) dominance is rapidly intensifying, driven by the promise of AI to revolutionize military capabilities and strategic advantages. Nations across the world, including the United States, China, and Russia, are pouring resources into AI research and development, aiming to gain an edge in this critical technology domain.

In the United States, AI has been designated as the second-highest priority for research and development, underscoring its strategic significance for national security. The U.S. Department of Defense has committed substantial funding—up to $2 billion over five years—to propel advancements in AI technologies. Through initiatives like the American AI Initiative and platforms such as AI.gov, the U.S. government is rallying efforts to accelerate AI innovation and adoption across various sectors.

China, on the other hand, has embarked on an ambitious quest to emerge as the world leader in AI by 2030. With a comprehensive national AI development plan and significant investments, China aims to rival established market leaders and leverage AI across diverse domains, including military applications. China’s emphasis on language and facial recognition technologies, coupled with its pursuit of swarm technologies and cyber capabilities, reflects its strategic intent to harness AI for national security and defense.

The Chinese government’s assertive approach to AI development, backed by substantial investments and strategic partnerships, underscores its determination to challenge U.S. dominance in this crucial technology realm. However, concerns persist regarding China’s use of AI for domestic surveillance and military purposes, raising questions about the ethical implications and geopolitical ramifications of its AI strategy.

Meanwhile, Russia is also positioning itself as a formidable contender in the AI race, recognizing the transformative potential of intelligent machines for national security and defense. President Vladimir Putin has underscored the strategic importance of AI, framing it as essential for rebalancing global power dynamics. With the approval of the National Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence and concerted efforts to standardize AI development, Russia aims to enhance its military capabilities and technological prowess.

In the dynamic landscape of AI competition, nations are racing to harness the transformative potential of this technology, seeking to secure military superiority and advance national interests. As the AI race unfolds, the strategic implications for global security and geopolitical stability are profound, shaping the contours of future conflict and cooperation in an AI-driven world

United States:

With its vast resources and advanced technological base, the United States is at the forefront of AI development for military applications. The Pentagon has launched several initiatives, such as the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC), to accelerate AI adoption across all branches of the military. From unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to autonomous submarines, the U.S. military is leveraging AI to enhance its capabilities and maintain its strategic edge.

China:

Recognizing the transformative potential of AI in warfare, China has made significant investments in AI research and development. China,  has outlined ambitious plans to become a global leader in AI technology by 2030, with significant investments in research and development.

Chinese military strategists emphasize the integration of AI into command and operational design, aiming to build invulnerable systems-of-systems and enhance operational capabilities. Concepts such as swarm attrition warfare, autonomous dormant assault warfare, and autonomous cross-domain mobile warfare illustrate China’s innovative approach to intelligentized warfare.

The Chinese military, or People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is actively pursuing AI-driven technologies, including swarming drones, intelligent surveillance systems, and AI-enhanced cyber warfare capabilities. China’s ambitious military modernization efforts aim to establish the PLA as a dominant force in future intelligentized warfare.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is actively pursuing the concept of intelligent operations, which involves leveraging AI and cutting-edge technologies across operational command, equipment, tactics, and other areas. Intelligent warfare, as envisioned by PLA analysts, emphasizes the use of unmanned systems to reduce decision-making cycles and achieve strategic objectives.

China’s Intelligentized Warfare

In the realm of military strategy, Chinese theorists assert that artificial intelligence (AI) holds the key to revolutionizing command structures and operational planning. Rooted in Marxist-Leninist ideology, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) views warfare as a scientific endeavor, ripe for systematic analysis and manipulation to achieve desired outcomes. By harnessing AI and machine learning, the PLA aims to develop algorithms and tools capable of predicting and controlling combat scenarios, thereby enhancing the resilience and effectiveness of its military systems.

The PLA has devised a series of operational concepts under the banner of intelligentized warfare, encompassing autonomous swarm attrition warfare, dormant assault warfare, cross-domain mobile warfare, and cognitive control warfare. These concepts leverage AI-driven autonomous systems to execute decentralized operations, surprise attacks, and swift, coordinated maneuvers across multiple domains, thereby challenging adversary decision-making and response capabilities.

Central to the PLA’s strategy is the notion of “intelligent operations,” which integrates AI into all facets of operational command, equipment, and tactics. By leveraging AI’s core capabilities, such as system intelligence, multi-domain integration, and intelligent autonomy, the PLA aims to transcend traditional constraints of time and space, forging new models of command and control that adapt swiftly to changing battlefield dynamics.

Chinese military strategists assert that intelligentized warfare represents an evolution of informationized warfare, characterized by sophisticated system-of-systems confrontations facilitated by digital networks. China’s vision for intelligentized warfare emphasizes the development of long-range, precise, and unmanned weapons platforms, aligned with the nation’s ambition to assert dominance in future conflicts.

To achieve its objectives, the PLA is investing heavily in cutting-edge technologies, including AI, quantum information, big data, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things. Through international security cooperation and technological innovation, China aims to close the technological gap with its adversaries and emerge as a formidable force in the era of intelligent warfare.

Analysts such as Li Minghai highlight the transformative potential of AI algorithms in providing PLA soldiers with a cognitive advantage on the battlefield. By harnessing big data and quantum computing capabilities, these algorithms enable rapid decision-making and operational planning, empowering troops to anticipate and counter enemy actions effectively.

Moreover, Li envisions a future where intelligent operations are facilitated by a “cloud brain” network, seamlessly integrating combat units and decision-making systems. This interconnected infrastructure, bolstered by advanced neural networks, enhances situational awareness and enables real-time response capabilities across the battlefield.

The PLA’s Academy of Military Science plays a pivotal role in shaping the doctrinal framework for intelligentized warfare, spearheading initiatives to integrate AI, robotics, and intelligent manufacturing into military operations. Through ongoing reforms and academic outreach efforts, the PLA aims to optimize its capabilities and maintain strategic relevance in an increasingly AI-driven battlefield environment.

Russia:

Russia has also emerged as a key player in the global AI arms race, leveraging its technological expertise and military innovation. The Russian military is developing AI-powered weapons systems, such as autonomous tanks, hypersonic missiles, and unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs). Additionally, Russia has invested in AI-enabled command and control systems to enhance situational awareness and decision-making on the battlefield.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced the commencement of serial production of combat robots with autonomous capabilities, reflecting Russia’s commitment to integrating AI into its military arsenal. Despite Russia’s ambitious AI aspirations, challenges loom large, including budget constraints and a lack of significant progress in AI research compared to other global players. Nonetheless, Russia’s focus on developing AI-enabled military equipment and fostering collaboration between academia and the private sector underscores its commitment to leveraging AI for strategic advantage.

Collaboration between Russia and China in the field of high technology, including artificial intelligence, further enhances both countries’ military capabilities. Despite facing challenges such as limited research output and funding compared to the United States and China, Russia is leveraging its partnership with China to advance AI and autonomy initiatives.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu recently announced a significant milestone in the country’s military capabilities: the commencement of serial production of combat robots with autonomous militarized capabilities. This development marks a substantial leap forward in Russia’s pursuit of advanced technologies to enhance its military prowess.

As Russia grapples with the evolving landscape of military technology and its implications for global power dynamics, artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomy emerge as key areas of focus and potential influence. A comprehensive report titled “Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy in Russia,” authored by CNA, sheds light on Russia’s initiatives, achievements, and ambitions in AI and autonomy, contextualizing them within the broader technological landscape.

The report highlights Russian military strategists’ emphasis on achieving information dominance on the battlefield, with AI-enhanced technologies playing a pivotal role in leveraging battlefield data to protect Russian forces and neutralize adversary advantages. While concerns persist regarding the delegation of critical decision-making to AI systems, Russian efforts to integrate these capabilities into military platforms are unmistakable.

Moreover, Russia’s collaboration with China in the realm of high technology, particularly in artificial intelligence, underscores the depth of their strategic partnership. Despite external pressures, including sanctions targeting Russia and China, this partnership has flourished, bolstering both countries’ technological capabilities and resilience.

The report enumerates a diverse array of platforms under development by the Russian military, each incorporating varying degrees of AI and autonomy. These platforms encompass land, air, and sea vehicles, specialized mines, and even anthropomorphic robots capable of wielding firearms and performing complex tasks such as driving cars and space travel.

Australia

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative force in both civilian and military contexts, promising to reshape the nature of warfare. In the Defence sector, AI offers the potential to delegate certain tasks to machines, thereby freeing up human personnel, reducing cognitive load, and enabling a more focused utilization of human expertise where it matters most.

To facilitate Australia’s preparedness for the ethical and safe integration of AI into military capabilities, the Defence Science and Technology Group (DSTG) recently hosted The Technical Cooperation Program (TTCP) AI Strategic Challenge (AISC) in Jervis Bay, NSW. Over 150 Defence scientists from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States participated in live experiments and demonstrations aimed at pushing the boundaries of emerging AI technology.

The AISC featured five experimental AI streams, covering diverse missions and mission-systems, such as object detection and identification at the tactical edge, cooperative utilization of shared battlespace resources, and supporting the situational awareness of dismounted soldiers, among others. The goal was to stress-test AI solutions in operational environments to identify strengths and weaknesses and develop more resilient capabilities.

Throughout the challenge, there was a concerted effort to address the responsible use of AI and consider the legal and ethical implications of its implementation in the battlespace. The involvement of Defence groups like Navy, Army, and Air Force, alongside international partners, facilitated collaboration and knowledge-sharing, accelerating the transition of AI solutions to the warfighter.

The AISC also served as a platform for forward-thinking and planning, recognizing that AI is poised to become integrated into a wide range of mission systems across Defence in the future. Dr. Robert Hunjet, Program Leader of AI and Quantum Information Sciences at DSTG, emphasized the importance of addressing challenges associated with AI adoption, including performance under adversarial conditions, trust, and adherence to legal and ethical frameworks.

Overall, the AISC underscores the significance of AI in modern military operations and highlights the need for international collaboration to ensure its responsible and effective implementation. With AI technologies already in use, the focus now is on leveraging its potential to enhance efficiency and effectiveness while upholding ethical principles and maintaining trust in Defence systems.

Implications for Future Warfare:

The future of warfare is likely to be shaped by AI-enabled technologies, including autonomous systems and lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS). Nations are investing in AI research and development to gain a competitive edge, leading to the emergence of innovative concepts such as cognitive psychological warfare and cognitive confrontation.

Race for Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS)

Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS) represent a category of weapon systems endowed with the capability to independently identify and engage targets without direct human control. This concept of autonomy, often referred to as “human out of the loop” or “full autonomy,” distinguishes LAWS from human-supervised autonomous systems, where operators retain oversight and intervention capabilities. Another category, semi-autonomous systems, known as “human in the loop,” involves human operators in the target selection process.

LAWS necessitate sophisticated computer algorithms and sensor suites to classify targets, make engagement decisions, and guide weapons to their intended destinations. While these systems are not yet prevalent, they are envisioned to facilitate military operations in environments where traditional systems may face communication challenges. Analysts also speculate that LAWS could enhance precision targeting, reducing the risk of collateral damage or civilian casualties.

The US Navy, in collaboration with Lockheed Martin, the Office of Naval Research, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), is spearheading the development of the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). This advanced weapon system boasts a range exceeding 200 nautical miles and leverages next-generation guidance technology to track and neutralize a variety of targets, including enemy ships, submarines, drones, aircraft, and land-based assets. While human soldiers designate targets, LRASM utilizes artificial intelligence to evade defenses and execute final targeting decisions autonomously.

Meanwhile, the US Department of Defense’s (DoD) DARPA is funding the development of a robotic submarine system, envisaged for applications ranging from underwater mine detection to anti-submarine operations. The broader US DoD allocated USD 7.4 billion towards artificial intelligence, Big Data, and cloud technologies in fiscal year 2017. In contrast, China is heavily investing in AI to bolster its defense capabilities and is poised to emerge as a global leader in this domain by 2030.

China’s ambitions extend to the creation of a new generation of cruise missiles equipped with high-level artificial intelligence, boasting multifunctionality and reconfigurability based on modular design. This strategic endeavor, termed “remote warfare,” aims to deploy fleets of small ships armed with AI-enabled missiles to neutralize larger adversaries like aircraft carriers. Russia, on the other hand, has intensified research efforts into AI applications, particularly in semiautonomous and autonomous military vehicles. The Russian military is exploring AI integration across various domains, including unmanned aerial, naval, and undersea vehicles, with a focus on swarming capabilities to optimize cost-efficiency and operational effectiveness.

In conclusion, the race for Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems underscores the evolving landscape of modern warfare, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence and autonomous technologies. As nations vie for strategic superiority, the ethical and operational implications of deploying LAWS necessitate careful consideration to ensure responsible and effective utilization in future conflicts.

Cognitive Psychological Warfare

In contemporary warfare, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has paved the way for sophisticated cognitive psychological tactics, reshaping the dynamics of information operations and strategic maneuvers. Recent developments underscore the potential of AI in generating hyper-realistic digital forgeries, commonly referred to as “deep fakes,” which adversaries could exploit in the gray zones of conflict. These deep fake technologies pose a significant threat to the United States and its allies, facilitating the dissemination of false information, manipulation of public discourse, erosion of trust, and even attempts at governmental blackmail. Consequently, there is a growing consensus among analysts that social media platforms must bolster their defenses against deep fakes while enhancing content labeling and authentication measures to safeguard against information manipulation.

Articles such as “Cognitive Warfare: Dominating the Intelligence Age” shed light on a pivotal shift in military paradigms, particularly in the cognitive domain. Chinese military strategists emphasize the significance of decision-making within the OODA loop framework, recognizing it as a critical bottleneck in operational effectiveness. Future autonomous systems are envisioned to vie for cognitive superiority, enabling rapid decision cycles and parallel operations aimed at outmaneuvering adversaries. China’s strategic focus on cognitive warfare is evident in its pursuit of “cognitive confrontation,” a concept aimed at attaining decisive informational supremacy by disrupting enemy perceptions and understanding of the battlefield.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) seeks to leverage AI to orchestrate precise kinetic energy releases, strategically targeting an opponent’s system-of-systems to induce prolonged paralysis. Through cognitive-centric warfare, AI-driven autonomous systems empower the PLA to orchestrate highly coordinated attacks, either diffused across multiple nodes or concentrated on critical targets. By dominating the cognitive domain, the PLA aims to outpace adversaries in perceiving, adapting, and acting swiftly, thereby gaining a decisive edge in future conflicts.

Russia, too, is exploring innovative applications of AI in remote sensing and electronic warfare, with the potential to disrupt adversary communications and navigation capabilities on the battlefield. Moreover, Russia’s extensive use of AI for domestic propaganda, surveillance, and information operations underscores its strategic intent to wield AI as a potent tool for influencing geopolitical narratives and undermining adversaries’ strategic interests.

In conclusion, the integration of AI into cognitive psychological warfare represents a paradigm shift in modern military strategy, emphasizing the importance of informational supremacy and rapid decision-making in future conflicts. As nations continue to invest in AI-driven technologies, the strategic landscape of warfare is poised for further evolution, with cognitive dominance emerging as a decisive factor in shaping the outcome of tomorrow’s battles.

Challenges and Considerations:

While AI offers tremendous potential for military applications, it also presents ethical, legal, and strategic challenges. Concerns about autonomous weapons, algorithmic bias, and the erosion of trust in information warfare underscore the need for responsible AI governance and international cooperation.

The proliferation of AI technologies in warfare raises profound ethical, legal, and strategic implications. Concerns about autonomous weapons systems, algorithmic bias, and the potential for AI-driven escalation pose significant challenges for international security. Moreover, the race for AI dominance risks exacerbating geopolitical tensions and fueling arms races in other domains, such as space and cyberspace.

Conclusion:

The global AI arms race is reshaping the future of warfare, with the United States, China, and Russia leading the charge. As these nations invest heavily in AI-driven technologies and weapons systems, the implications for international security are profound. It is imperative for policymakers, military leaders, and technologists to address the ethical, legal, and strategic challenges posed by the proliferation of AI in warfare and work towards establishing norms and safeguards to ensure responsible AI use on the battlefield.

By leveraging AI responsibly and ethically, nations can enhance their military capabilities while upholding principles of human dignity and international law. The global AI arms race underscores the importance of strategic foresight and collaborative efforts to shape the future of intelligentized warfare.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References and Resources also include:

https://warontherocks.com/2020/06/chinese-debates-on-the-military-utility-of-artificial-intelligence/

https://breakingdefense.com/2020/11/military-ai-is-bigger-than-the-kill-chain-jaic-chief/

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-building-army-robot-weapons-chinas-ai-tech-helping-1594362

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2024-01-09/ai-technology-rises-challenge

 

 

 

About Rajesh Uppal

Check Also

Keeping Watch From the North Pole: US Space Force’s Next-Gen Missile Defense Program (NGP)

The responsibility of safeguarding the United States from missile threats is paramount. Enter the U.S. …

error: Content is protected !!