International Defense Security & Technology Your trusted Source for News, Research and Analysis
Related Articles
Introduction
The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, which initially erupted in 2014 with the annexation of Crimea, has escalated dramatically since February 2022 when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Despite Russia’s significant qualitative and quantitative advantages, Ukraine’s armed forces have mounted a formidable resistance, thwarting Russia’s initial expectations of a swift victory and transforming the conflict into a protracted and grueling war of attrition.
This war is now regarded as the first “commercial space war,” the first “drone war,” and the first “AI war,” showcasing the central role technology plays in contemporary conflict. From drones and cyber warfare to AI-powered systems and space technologies, this war has dramatically shifted the way military engagements are conducted, raising complex ethical and legal issues around their use in warfare. In this article, we will examine the role of these technologies in shaping the conflict and their broader implications for global military strategies.
The Evolution of Modern Warfare
The tensions between Russia and Ukraine have unfolded alongside a rapid technological evolution in warfare. Military strategies and battlefield tactics are increasingly dependent on cutting-edge technology, a trend that has been on full display throughout the conflict. The deployment of drones, electronic warfare systems, cyber capabilities, and satellite technologies has revolutionized the dynamics of combat, offering critical lessons for military powers worldwide.
Guided Missile Technology: A Symmetrical Arsenal
Guided missiles have been used extensively in past conflicts, such as in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Ukraine, however, both sides have similar access to this technology. Russian Iskander missiles and Anglo-French Storm Shadow missiles have been highly effective in targeting critical infrastructure and military positions deep behind enemy lines. Many of these targets are located using drones for reconnaissance, blurring the lines between different forms of military technology.
Early in the conflict, Russian military leadership expected a quick capitulation of Ukraine through limited ground coercion and an air campaign around Kyiv, involving Su-24, Su-35, and Su-30 SM fighters, as well as cruise missile strikes on airfields and missile sites. However, these efforts were poorly coordinated and largely ineffective, resulting in significant losses of Su-34s, Su-25s, KA-52s, and Mi-28 helicopters. Using effective “shoot and scoot” tactics, Ukrainian surface-to-air missile systems were able to counter Russia’s attempts to suppress Ukrainian air defenses, causing significant losses to Russian aircraft at both medium and low altitudes.
Anti-tank missiles are also playing a significant role in the conflict, with modern weapons like the Russian Kornet and U.S.-supplied Javelin being used to devastating effect. While anti-tank missiles are not a new technology—they were used by Egypt during the Yom Kippur War in 1973—today’s versions are far more advanced.
There are a number of factors that have contributed to the high number of Russian tank losses. One factor is the use of Western-supplied anti-tank weapons, such as the Javelin and NLAW missiles. These weapons are highly effective against tanks, and they have been used to great effect by Ukrainian forces. Another factor is the poor performance of the Russian military. Russian tanks have been poorly maintained, and they have been vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks. In addition, Russian commanders have made a number of mistakes, which have led to the loss of tanks.
The high number of Russian tank losses has had a major impact on the Russian military’s ability to fight. Tanks are a vital part of any modern army, and their loss has made it more difficult for the Russian military to advance. The Russian military is now facing a number of challenges, and it is unclear how it will be able to overcome them.
Supersonic and hypersonic missiles
Supersonic and hypersonic missiles have emerged as game-changers in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, showcasing their capabilities as advanced weapons. These missiles travel at speeds exceeding the speed of sound, making them highly challenging to detect and intercept. Supersonic missiles travel between Mach 1 and Mach 5, while hypersonic missiles exceed Mach 5, allowing them to strike targets with precision and limited warning time.
Russia has extensively deployed both supersonic and hypersonic missiles to target critical Ukrainian military infrastructure. These high-speed weapons have been used to destroy airfields, command and control centers, ammunition depots, and other strategic locations, causing significant damage. Hypersonic missiles, such as Russia’s Kinzhal (Kh-47M2), have been used to strike high-value targets with enhanced speed and maneuverability, making traditional defense systems ineffective against them.
While Ukraine has not employed hypersonic missiles in the conflict, it has developed its own supersonic missile, the Kh-22, capable of reaching speeds of up to Mach 4.5. Although this missile is not as advanced as Russia’s hypersonic arsenal, it represents Ukraine’s attempt to modernize its military capabilities in response to evolving threats.
The use of supersonic and hypersonic missiles in this conflict reflects a broader shift in modern warfare. These weapons, due to their high velocity and ability to evade interception, represent a significant advancement over traditional ballistic and cruise missiles. Their speed and precision make them more dangerous, and they are likely to play an increasingly pivotal role in future military engagements, pushing the development of more sophisticated missile defense systems and raising the stakes in global security.
Drone Warfare: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) Take Center Stage
Drones have become one of the most defining technologies in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, fundamentally reshaping modern combat. Both nations have extensively deployed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for intelligence gathering, reconnaissance, and precision strikes. However, Ukraine has notably transformed drone warfare by repurposing civilian drones for military applications, demonstrating how inexpensive, off-the-shelf technology can challenge a superior adversary. This shift has allowed Ukraine to conduct cost-effective, high-impact operations, countering Russia’s conventional military strength.
A major aspect of Ukraine’s drone strategy is the use of commercial UAVs for tactical advantage. Ukrainian forces, along with groups like Aerorozvidka, have modified consumer drones by equipping them with night vision cameras, thermal sensors, and small explosives. These lightweight, agile UAVs have been instrumental in tracking Russian movements, coordinating artillery strikes, and conducting kamikaze-style attacks on military assets. This innovative approach has not only disrupted traditional battlefield strategies but has also allowed Ukraine to maximize its military effectiveness at a fraction of the cost of conventional weapons.
The “Army of Drones” initiative further highlights the importance of UAVs in Ukraine’s defense efforts. This large-scale program seeks to procure and deploy thousands of commercial drones while training operators to enhance their battlefield utility. Drones used in this initiative serve multiple roles, from monitoring the frontlines and gathering intelligence to launching direct strikes on Russian positions. These UAVs provide a crucial advantage by improving targeting accuracy, reducing collateral damage, and enabling real-time situational awareness on the battlefield.
Meanwhile, Russia has also relied on UAVs, though its approach has been less effective. While the Russian military possesses a variety of drones, they have primarily been used for reconnaissance rather than large-scale offensive operations. However, Iran-supplied Shahed-136 drones have played a significant role in long-range attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure, targeting power grids and civilian areas. The increasing reliance on drones by both sides has not only escalated the conflict but has also raised concerns about the global proliferation of UAV technology and its impact on future warfare.
As the conflict continues, drone warfare is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Both sides are working to overcome tactical limitations, improve counter-drone measures, and scale up production to maintain their aerial advantage. Reports suggest that drone losses exceed 10,000 units per month, making rapid innovation and mass production critical. The race to develop more autonomous, resilient, and cost-effective UAVs will likely shape the future of warfare far beyond Ukraine, setting new precedents for military strategy and technological warfare.
Satellite Technology: The New Battlefront in Space
Satellite imagery has been a valuable tool for both sides in the conflict. Satellites can provide high-resolution images of enemy territory, which can be used to plan attacks and to assess the damage caused by airstrikes. It has helped them to track the movement of troops, assess the damage caused by airstrikes, and document the human cost of the war. Satellite imagery is likely to continue to be used in future conflicts, as it is a valuable tool for gathering intelligence and assessing the impact of war. Satellite imagery from companies like Maxar has provided real-time insights into troop movements and the destruction caused by artillery and airstrikes, offering transparency and accountability in the global media’s coverage of the war.
The importance of satellite technology in the Russia-Ukraine conflict has been highlighted through the use of commercial satellites for communications, intelligence gathering, and precision strikes. SpaceX’s Starlink system, in particular, has been a game-changer for Ukraine. Over 30,000 Starlink terminals were delivered to ensure internet connectivity for the Ukrainian military, government, and civilians, even in areas where traditional communications were disrupted by cyberattacks or Russian electronic warfare.
Starlink’s resilience against cyberattacks has allowed Ukrainian forces to maintain communication with global allies, access intelligence, and coordinate military operations. Starlink has also been used by civilians in Ukraine. Many people have used Starlink to stay connected with friends and family, to access news and information, and to work remotely. Starlink’s role in the Russia-Ukraine conflict is a reminder of the importance of reliable and affordable internet access. In times of crisis, internet access can be essential for communication, coordination, and other critical tasks.
AI and Data-Driven Warfare: Software-Defined Battlefields
The Ukraine conflict has also brought AI and data fusion to the forefront of military operations. Data collection, analysis, and fusion are instrumental in the country’s defense. AI-enabled systems automate drone operations, target acquisition, and reduce the sensor-to-shooter loop. This integration has drastically improved Ukraine’s battlespace awareness, enabling rapid response to threats.
Ukrainian forces have integrated AI systems into their drone operations, automating tasks like target acquisition and reducing the sensor-to-shooter time. Companies like Palantir, Helsing, and Scale AI have played pivotal roles in enabling Ukraine to process vast amounts of battlefield data, enhancing the country’s ability to make rapid decisions and gain an edge in real-time combat scenarios.
Russia, by contrast, has struggled to leverage its AI capabilities effectively on the battlefield, due to factors such as sanctions, technological isolation, and a brain drain of skilled professionals. The limitations of Russian AI warfare suggest a critical gap between their ambitions and on-ground reality. The AI claims of the Russian military leadership are not consistently reflected in practical results within the conflict.
Cyber Warfare: The New Invisible Battleground
Cyber warfare has been a critical component of the Russia-Ukraine conflict since its start in February 2022, highlighting the importance of cyberspace in modern military strategy. Both nations have launched cyberattacks to disrupt each other’s critical infrastructure, spread confusion, and undermine morale. Russia, in particular, has conducted notable cyber offensives, including a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack that crippled Ukrainian government websites on the day of the invasion. Additionally, Russian cyber forces have targeted Ukraine’s power plants, banks, and telecommunications systems, causing widespread economic damage and disruption.
Ukraine has not been passive in this cyber conflict, launching retaliatory strikes against Russian infrastructure. Ukrainian hackers have claimed to penetrate Russian state-owned media, broadcasting pro-Ukrainian messages, and disrupting Russian government websites and banks. This counteroffensive has served to undermine Russian operations and challenge Moscow’s control over the information space.
Beyond direct cyberattacks, the conflict has also involved a battle of narratives through disinformation and propaganda. Russia has been accused of spreading fake news and disinformation on social media to discredit Ukraine and its allies, while Ukraine has used platforms like Telegram and Twitter to rally international support and push back against Russian propaganda. Both sides recognize the power of shaping public perception and morale in this conflict.
The Russia-Ukraine war demonstrates the evolving role of cyber warfare in modern conflicts. Cyberattacks, which are relatively low-cost and hard to attribute, offer a powerful means to target a nation’s infrastructure, economy, and civilian population without deploying physical military forces. As cyber capabilities grow more advanced, they will likely become even more integral to future conflicts, driving nations to strengthen their cyber defenses and resilience.
Electronic Warfare: Disrupting the Spectrum
Electronic warfare (EW) refers to the use of electromagnetic energy to disrupt an adversary’s access to the electromagnetic spectrum, impacting communications, radar, and other electronic systems. Through techniques such as jamming, spoofing, and signal interference, EW can impair an enemy’s ability to operate effectively while deceiving them by manipulating their systems into providing false information. This dual role—both defensive and offensive—makes EW a critical asset in modern warfare.
In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, EW has played a transformative role in shaping military engagements on both sides. Russia, with its well-established and advanced EW capabilities, has employed these systems to jam Ukrainian communications, radar, and drone operations, thereby hampering Ukraine’s command and control networks.
On the other side, Ukraine has also employed EW tactics to jam Russian communications and radar systems, though with less sophisticated technology and fewer assets compared to Russia. Despite these challenges, Ukraine has made strides in developing effective EW tactics and acquiring advanced EW equipment from Western allies, allowing it to mitigate some of the impact of Russian EW operations.
However, Ukraine has not remained passive. Faced with a technologically superior adversary, Ukrainian forces have embraced innovation and agility, developing home-grown EW solutions that range from short-range jamming systems to sophisticated radio signal tracking stations.
Recent breakthroughs in Ukraine’s EW efforts underscore the rapid evolution of this field. Technical advancements have been achieved by local startups, such as Falcons, which has engineered compact, tripod-mounted stations capable of parsing diverse radio signals—including those from drones, repeaters, and even 5G cell networks—with remarkable tactical precision. These systems allow operators to identify the “fingerprint” of each UAV in real time, determining whether a signal originates from friendly forces or enemy assets. Similarly, companies like Himera have reimagined secure communications by developing low-cost, encrypted walkie-talkies that use signal-hopping and mesh networking. This approach ensures robust, reliable communication even in the presence of jamming and other EW tactics.
Operationally, Ukraine’s rapid and resourceful response to EW challenges is bolstered by initiatives such as Brave1, a joint platform by the Ministries of Defense and Digital Transformation that supports over 100 EW projects. These projects, driven by local inventors and supported by government funding, emphasize agility and adaptability. Their solutions are deployed directly on the front lines, providing immediate, tactical advantages despite the complex and chaotic electromagnetic environment created by constant jamming and spoofing efforts. The industry’s collaborative efforts, supported by international standards and growing local expertise, are gradually shifting the balance in favor of Ukrainian forces.
The impact of EW on the conflict has been profound, making it challenging for both sides to communicate and execute coordinated strategies. It has restricted the effective use of electronic systems, including radars, drones, and GPS-guided munitions, which are vital for modern warfare. The disruption caused by EW has led to increased confusion on the battlefield, with both sides seeking ways to counteract the effects and maintain operational effectiveness.
The extensive use of EW in this conflict highlights its critical importance in modern combat, where control of the electromagnetic spectrum is tantamount to achieving strategic dominance. As the technology continues to evolve, both sides are locked in an ongoing race of innovation—each new breakthrough met with a countermeasure. This dynamic environment not only underscores the challenges of operating in an EW-saturated battlefield but also illustrates the potential for home-grown, agile innovations to disrupt traditional power dynamics. Ultimately, the developments in Ukraine serve as a powerful example of how electronic warfare, when coupled with ingenuity and rapid adaptation, can become a decisive factor in modern military operations.
Lessons for Future Conflicts
The Russia-Ukraine war offers several important lessons about the future of warfare. First, the importance of technology cannot be overstated; nations that can integrate advanced technologies such as drones, AI, satellites, and cyber capabilities into their military strategies are likely to hold a decisive advantage. Second, the rapid pace of technological change means that military forces must remain flexible and adaptable to new innovations, as traditional methods and equipment quickly become obsolete.
Finally, this conflict has raised significant ethical and legal questions. The widespread use of autonomous systems, the involvement of commercial entities like SpaceX, and the use of AI to make life-and-death decisions have blurred the lines between combatants and non-combatants, making it imperative that international laws adapt to this new reality of war.
Conclusion
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been a vivid showcase of how military technologies are reshaping modern warfare. From drones and cyber weapons to AI and satellite technologies, these advancements have revolutionized the battlefield and introduced new paradigms for how wars are fought. The lessons drawn from this conflict will influence military strategies worldwide and will likely shape the future of defense technology for years to come.
References and Resources also include:
https://ecfr.eu/publication/star-tech-enterprise-emerging-technologies-in-russias-war-on-ukraine/
