International Defense Security & Technology Your trusted Source for News, Research and Analysis
Introduction: The New Frontline of Global Power
In the 21st century, wars may not be fought solely with missiles or soldiers but with minerals. Clean energy systems, electric vehicles, semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and next-generation defense platforms all rely on critical materials such as neodymium, dysprosium, lithium, cobalt, gallium, germanium, and graphite. These resources are the invisible backbone powering EV motors, missile guidance systems, wind turbines, smartphones, and advanced chips.
China dominates these supply chains, controlling roughly 70% of global rare earths mining, 90% of refining, over 95% of natural graphite processing, and commanding production of gallium, germanium, manganese, and many battery-grade chemicals. Its dominance has become a strategic lever in Beijing’s geopolitical toolkit. As electrification and digitalization accelerate, countries worldwide are mobilizing to counterbalance this concentration, marking a new era of resource competition and strategic diversification.
China’s Monopoly: Strategic by Design
China’s dominance stems from decades of deliberate, state-directed planning rather than geological fortune. Since the 1980s, Beijing invested aggressively in mining and refining while Western nations outsourced heavy industry due to environmental and economic pressures.
Key to China’s rise was a long-term industrial policy, exemplified by Deng Xiaoping’s declaration, “The Middle East has oil; China has rare earths.” State subsidies and regulatory flexibility gave Chinese producers price advantages unmatched in the West. Vertical integration enabled control from ore extraction to finished components like magnets and batteries, while international acquisitions in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America secured overseas feedstock. By the 2000s, China had become the global hub for rare earths, gallium, and battery-grade metals, creating dominance that now faces coordinated global resistance.
The Anatomy of Dominance: From Mines to Megafactories
China’s control spans the entire value chain. State-backed giants such as China Rare Earth Group and Northern Rare Earth Group allow Beijing to dictate pricing, production volumes, and export flows, making it a global leader in magnets, battery chemicals, and EV components.
Chinese companies secure access through global investments, controlling over 70% of cobalt from the Democratic Republic of Congo, 90% of new nickel refining capacity in Indonesia, and strategic lithium projects in Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina. Market strategies often involve flooding markets with cheap minerals, triggering price collapses, forcing Western mines into bankruptcy, and acquiring distressed assets. Proxy influence extends to policies abroad, such as Indonesia’s nickel export bans, reshaping global supply chains.
Technology-Specific Chokepoints
China’s influence permeates every major clean-energy and defense sector. EVs rely on neodymium and dysprosium magnets, 92% of which are produced in China, and even lithium iron phosphate batteries depend on purified phosphoric acid, with China controlling 75% of global capacity. Offshore wind turbines require rare earth magnets, and Europe depends on China for roughly 90% of key magnet materials.
In solar energy, China produces 80% of polysilicon, while gallium and indium for thin-film panels are also Chinese-dominated. Recent export controls on gallium, germanium, and graphite highlight the fragility of semiconductor and defense supply chains. These pressures are driving investments in alternative supply chains, material innovation, and recycling technologies.
Rare Earths: The Invisible Backbone of Modern Technology
Rare earth elements power magnets, sensors, guidance systems, displays, and catalysts. A single F-35 jet requires over 400 kilograms of rare earths. China also dominates gallium, germanium, and antimony production, critical for semiconductors, infrared systems, and night-vision technologies.
| Material | China’s Share | Chokepoint | Vulnerable Sector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rare Earths | 90% refining | Magnets | EVs, wind, defense |
| Graphite | 95% processing | Anodes | EV batteries |
| Gallium | 98% production | Semiconductors | Chips, LEDs |
| Germanium | 75% refining | Optics & sensors | Defense, telecom |
| Cobalt | 60% refining | Cathodes | Aviation, EVs |
| Polysilicon | 80% production | Solar supply | Solar |
| Manganese sulfate | 95% | Battery precursor | Grid storage |
The Looming Copper Crisis
Copper, essential for electrification, is emerging as a global bottleneck. The International Energy Agency projects a 30% supply gap by 2035. EVs use three to four times more copper than traditional cars, and offshore wind requires up to 15,000 tons per gigawatt. China refines 60% of global copper and controls roughly 40% of Africa’s reserves. The U.S., EU, and Japan are pursuing new exploration and recycling methods to mitigate supply risks.
Trade Wars and Weaponization of Resources
China has strategically used export controls to influence markets, from the 2010 rare earth ban on Japan to restrictions on gallium, germanium, and graphite between 2023 and 2025, and temporary freezes on rare earth magnets amid U.S. tariff escalations. These measures disrupted EV and semiconductor supply chains. Western nations responded with policies like the U.S. Defense Production Act, the EU Critical Raw Materials Act, and long-term supply agreements secured by Japan.
Global Impact: Europe, India, and the Search for Alternatives
Europe is highly exposed due to ambitious climate targets but is investing in recycling, magnet production, and African partnerships. The EU aims to achieve significant domestic mining, processing, and recycling by 2030. India is rapidly expanding EV and semiconductor sectors, launching the Critical Minerals Mission and joining the U.S.-led Mineral Security Partnership while exploring deep-sea mining and refining capacity. Australia and Canada are emerging as cornerstone suppliers, supported by U.S. funding, Japanese offtake agreements, and European guarantees, although permitting delays and higher costs persist. Diversification of supply chains will take five to ten years to meaningfully reduce dependence on China.
Military Vulnerabilities: The Silent Weakness
Modern militaries rely heavily on Chinese minerals for sensors, propulsion systems, satellites, and missile electronics. Western defense agencies are increasing strategic stockpiles, funding domestic magnet manufacturing, mandating “China-free” supply chains for priority weapons, and accelerating processing capacity under national security exemptions. Defense diversification has progressed faster than commercial sectors due to strong government intervention, though full independence remains years away.
The Energy Transition Under Siege
Technologies intended to reduce global emissions—EVs, batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels—remain dependent on supply chains dominated by a single geopolitical rival, creating a “green chokehold.” Global responses include new mines in Australia, Canada, the U.S., and Sweden; refining hubs in Vietnam, India, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE; rapid adoption of sodium-ion, iron-air, and solid-state batteries; and research into rare-earth-free motors and alternative magnets. The clean-energy ecosystem is beginning to diversify but is not yet at scale.
The Illusion of Diversification
Challenges remain despite investments. Recycling can meet only around 30% of 2030 demand. Western mines require seven to ten years to start operations, compared with two to three years for Chinese projects. Chinese firms benefit from state financing covering a significant portion of costs. Shifts are underway, however, driven by the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, accelerated EU permitting rules, and India–Japan co-development of rare earth refining outside China. Diversification is real but lags behind China’s consolidation, and the coming decade will determine whether alternative supply chains can catch up.
Moving Forward: Strategies for Resilience
Building long-term resilience requires expanding mining and refining outside China in Africa, Latin America, Australia, Canada, India, and the U.S. Investment in substitutes and new technologies, including rare-earth-free motors, cobalt-free cathodes, iron-air batteries, and quantum materials, is essential. Strengthening alliances through partnerships such as the Mineral Security Partnership, the Quad, and EU–Africa agreements will secure ethical supply chains. Developing circular economies through recycling, urban mining, and advanced recovery technologies is increasingly vital. Ensuring environmental and labor standards will determine global legitimacy, particularly compared with Xinjiang-linked supply chains.
Conclusion: The New Geopolitical Battlefield
Critical minerals have become strategic assets shaping military readiness, economic competitiveness, and the clean-energy transition. China’s dominance, built through decades of industrial planning, grants it immense leverage. Yet governments and industries worldwide are investing, coordinating, and innovating at unprecedented scale. The geopolitical contest of the 21st century will not be fought solely in conference rooms or on battlefields, but in mines, refineries, and advanced-materials laboratories worldwide. Rare earths and strategic minerals are instruments of power, and the nations that secure resilient, ethical, and diversified supply chains will shape the future of energy, technology, and sovereignty.
