International Defense Security & Technology Your trusted Source for News, Research and Analysis
Beyond the limits of human hearing, ultrasonic waves—frequencies above 20 kHz—are rapidly emerging as a powerful enabler of covert communication, secure authentication, and futuristic warfare capabilities. As vulnerabilities in traditional radio-frequency (RF) systems become increasingly apparent, ultrasonic technologies present a compelling alternative. These sound-based communications bypass electromagnetic shielding, offer precise directional control, and require a physical medium for transmission, making remote interception difficult or impossible. Across military, intelligence, and security applications, ultrasonic communication is ushering in a silent but profound transformation.
Ultrasonic communication works by transmitting sound waves through a physical medium, such as air, water, or even human tissue. Unlike RF waves, which travel through electromagnetic radiation and can propagate through a vacuum, ultrasound requires a tangible medium to travel. This makes its behavior distinctly different and highly situational.
Ultrasound typically exhibits shorter range due to higher attenuation over distance and through obstructions. However, its directionality allows it to be precisely focused using transducers, minimizing unwanted dispersion. Another key advantage lies in its safety and non-interference: ultrasound doesn’t crowd the critical RF spectrum used by medical and aviation devices and is generally perceived as safer for biological tissues.
The Technology Behind the Silence
Reliable ultrasonic communication demands a suite of sophisticated technologies. At its core, modulation techniques like Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), Phase Shift Keying (PSK), and Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM) are employed to encode data onto ultrasonic carrier waves. Piezoelectric transducers, commonly made from ceramic materials, are key components for efficiently converting electrical signals into ultrasonic waves and back.
On the receiving end, powerful signal processing algorithms are necessary to filter out noise, compensate for Doppler shifts caused by motion, mitigate multipath interference from echoes, and decode data accurately. These systems must be highly optimized, especially when used in noisy environments or within the body. Moreover, power efficiency remains a cornerstone of design, particularly for devices like implants or wearables that rely on small batteries or energy harvesting.
Ultrasound’s Edge: Why It Thrives in Secure Environments
Ultrasound stands apart from electromagnetic (EM) communication due to its reliance on mechanical wave propagation—specifically, oscillations of pressure and particle displacement known as phonons. These waves require a physical medium—such as air, water, or solid material—to travel through, unlike RF signals which propagate as electromagnetic fields even through a vacuum. This dependency makes ultrasonic systems uniquely suited to environments hostile to EM waves, such as underwater domains, metallic compartments, and RF-shielded environments like Faraday cages. In such locations, traditional wireless systems are ineffective, but ultrasound remains viable, often the only practical option for short-range secure data exchange.
A key feature of ultrasonic propagation is its spatial confinement and directional controllability. Ultrasonic beams, especially those in the mid- to high-kilohertz range, can be tightly focused using parabolic reflectors, phased arrays, or MEMS-based transducer networks. This narrow beamwidth not only allows for energy-efficient transmission but also dramatically reduces side-lobe leakage and signal diffusion—making it highly resistant to eavesdropping or remote interception. This makes ultrasound an invaluable medium in security-conscious environments where communication integrity and stealth are paramount.
Moreover, ultrasound’s typical operating frequencies—ranging from 18 kHz to several megahertz—place it well outside the human auditory range and beneath the radar of most commercial surveillance infrastructure. This inaudibility allows ultrasonic systems to function silently and covertly, ideal for applications in defense, critical infrastructure, and proximity-based authentication. The absence of an electromagnetic footprint ensures that ultrasonic communications cannot be detected using RF spectrum analyzers, rendering them invisible to most conventional wireless intrusion detection systems. This inherent stealth supports use cases like silent signaling between embedded devices, contactless access control, and non-disruptive data transfer within classified environments.
Another security strength lies in ultrasound’s limited propagation range, especially in air, where attenuation from molecular absorption and scattering limits effective distances to approximately 5–15 meters depending on frequency and power. While this might be a disadvantage in some communication contexts, in security settings, it becomes a natural asset—enforcing physical proximity as a requirement for data exchange. This spatial constraint acts as a built-in defense mechanism against long-distance interception or man-in-the-middle attacks, making ultrasound a compelling choice for device pairing, digital key delivery, and other scenarios where proximity verification is a prerequisite for secure operation.
Defense Applications: From Submarines to Sonic Weaponry
In underwater and enclosed-space communications, ultrasonic systems outperform RF. Submarine networks are increasingly adopting ultrasonic modems that allow for real-time data and power transfer through metal hulls without compromising sonar stealth. Recent demonstrations have achieved transmission rates of 19.2 kbps through five-millimeter-thick steel plates with fluid layers in between. Similarly, using copper piping within bunkers and naval vessels enables secure, high-fidelity communication shielded from RF-based espionage.
Beyond communications, ultrasound is also at the heart of emerging military-grade acoustic weapons. Phonon lasers—or “sasers”—can produce highly focused beams that induce disorientation, nausea, or even internal injury at a distance. These systems operate at targeted frequencies to disrupt drone gyroscopes or trigger destructive resonances in mechanical components like engine mounts or bridge joints. For example, frequencies as low as 2–15 Hz can induce vertigo for non-lethal crowd control, while frequencies between 1–5 kHz can accelerate metal fatigue in critical infrastructure. High-intensity ultrasound in the 20–100 kHz range can interfere with electronic sensors or disable enemy communications.
In field operations, ultrasonic networks are being explored for tactical communication where RF jamming is present. Devices embedded with ultrasonic transducers can establish ad hoc links through soil or water, relaying situational data and commands discreetly. Low-frequency ultrasound also enables stealthy terrain mapping, providing an alternative to traditional sonar. More advanced research is investigating quantum sonars using phonon lasers, capable of subatomic-resolution detection of submerged targets—potentially revolutionizing anti-submarine warfare.
Emerging Threats: Ultrasound as a Cyber-Physical Attack Vector
As ultrasonic communication technologies proliferate across consumer and industrial domains, their misuse has become a growing concern, giving rise to a new class of cyber-physical attacks that exploit the silent, often invisible nature of acoustic waves. One prominent example is the surfing attack, where ultrasonic commands are transmitted through solid media like wooden tables, glass panes, or metal surfaces to activate voice assistants such as Siri or Google Assistant on nearby smartphones. These inaudible commands can silently trigger malicious actions—placing calls, sending texts, or altering device configurations—all without the user’s awareness. Research has shown success rates approaching 88% across multiple commercial phone models, highlighting both the feasibility and scalability of this exploit.
Beyond direct command injection, ultrasonic beacons have emerged as a covert method of surveillance and behavioral profiling. These high-frequency signals, embedded in advertisements, retail displays, or television audio, can trigger software on nearby devices equipped with microphones. The result is the creation of “acoustic cookies”—unique audio fingerprints that allow marketers or third parties to correlate and track user behavior across physical environments and digital platforms. When used across multiple devices in a single space (e.g., phone, tablet, smart speaker), they can reconstruct detailed behavioral and movement profiles without any user interaction or consent, raising serious ethical and regulatory concerns.
The threat landscape becomes even more alarming when extended to critical infrastructure and industrial control systems (ICS). The DolphinAttack, demonstrated in 2017, proved that ultrasonic voice commands could be embedded above the threshold of human hearing but still be interpreted by MEMS microphones in smart devices. These commands bypass traditional auditory filters and can be used to open malicious web pages, approve unauthorized actions, or impersonate legitimate users in biometric systems. In industrial settings, ultrasonic waves can be tuned to interfere with sensors or cause mechanical resonance in actuators and pipelines. Such attacks could falsify sensor data in feedback loops or even cause physical damage by exploiting resonance-induced fatigue or structural instability.
These developments underscore a fundamental shift in cybersecurity: threats are no longer limited to the electromagnetic domain. The ability of ultrasound to bypass human perception and traditional digital firewalls makes it a potent vector for espionage, sabotage, and unauthorized access. As consumer electronics and IoT systems become increasingly microphone-enabled and always-listening, the attack surface expands dramatically. Addressing these risks demands not only technological countermeasures but also greater public awareness, standardized regulation, and integration of acoustic threat models into broader security frameworks.
Countermeasures: Defending the Acoustic Perimeter
Defending against ultrasonic threats requires a defense-in-depth strategy that spans hardware, software, communication protocols, and physical barriers. At the hardware level, the first line of defense involves equipping devices with ultrasonic firewalls—real-time monitoring systems that scan microphone input for anomalous activity in the ultrasonic frequency range (typically above 18 kHz). Tools like the SoniControl app operate by detecting these signals and deploying jamming bursts of white noise or anti-phase signals to disrupt unauthorized ultrasonic transmissions. More proactively, hardware manufacturers are incorporating MEMS microphones with integrated low-pass filters or programmable frequency cutoffs to automatically reject high-frequency audio, effectively rendering the device deaf to ultrasonic intrusion attempts.
On the software and protocol front, efforts are being made to standardize secure ultrasonic communication channels. The SoniTalk framework, an open-source ultrasonic data exchange protocol, emphasizes privacy and transparency. It uses end-to-end encryption and user-controlled permission layers to regulate who can transmit and receive ultrasonic data. Furthermore, it embeds digital watermarks and authentication tags into the signal stream, enabling recipient devices to distinguish between verified commands and potential spoofing attacks. Such cryptographic safeguards are essential in preventing command injection, particularly in smart homes, access control systems, and wearables that support acoustic communication.
Physical countermeasures serve as an often-overlooked but highly effective layer of protection. Material impedance mismatches can significantly attenuate or block ultrasound transmission. For instance, placing smartphones on a layer of woven or porous fabric (e.g., denim or felt) introduces scattering and absorption losses that can reduce ultrasonic coupling efficiency by as much as 95%, disrupting surface-conducted attacks. Similarly, enclosing sensitive microphones or sensors in metallic mesh cages or Faraday-style acoustic shields prevents high-frequency sound waves from entering while still allowing lower-frequency ambient sound to pass through unimpeded.
Ultimately, defending the acoustic domain requires increased security awareness among consumers, developers, and industry stakeholders. While RF-related cyber threats are well understood and actively mitigated, ultrasonic channels remain a blind spot in many cybersecurity architectures. Moving forward, the adoption of standardized acoustic intrusion detection systems, acoustic anomaly monitoring, and firmware-level filtering will be crucial in preventing the exploitation of this silent yet powerful communication vector. As ultrasonic technology continues to evolve, so must our capacity to secure the invisible perimeter it creates.
Next-Gen Battlefield Technologies: What’s Coming
The next wave of ultrasonic innovation is poised to radically alter the tactical landscape of modern warfare. At the forefront are graphene-based transducers, which leverage the exceptional mechanical and electrical properties of graphene to produce highly efficient, ultra-wideband acoustic emissions. These advanced transducers are enabling hypersonic air-to-air communication links operating at frequencies around 400 kHz with data rates approaching 800 kbps. Because of the rapid attenuation of ultrasound in air, these communication channels are extremely short-range and highly directional, making them nearly impossible to intercept or jam with conventional electronic warfare tools. Furthermore, graphene’s high acoustic impedance allows such systems to penetrate multiple layers of composite armor, enabling secure intra-vehicle data and power transmission in combat scenarios where electromagnetic shielding or jamming is prevalent.
Another emerging capability is neuro-acoustic weaponry, an area that bridges neuroscience, directed energy systems, and acoustic physics. Using focused ultrasound beams, military researchers are developing systems for non-invasive neuromodulation, which can stimulate or suppress neural activity in targeted brain regions. On the one hand, this offers therapeutic potential—such as restoring cognitive function after traumatic brain injury or enhancing alertness and decision-making in soldiers. On the other, it introduces a new class of non-lethal weapons capable of temporarily disorienting or incapacitating adversaries by altering neural oscillations, inducing confusion, fatigue, or even involuntary muscle responses. Such capabilities demand urgent ethical and legal examination, especially under the scope of the Geneva Conventions and existing international treaties governing psychological and biological warfare.
Even more revolutionary is the advent of quantum phononics—a nascent field that merges quantum mechanics with acoustic wave manipulation. Researchers are working toward phonon-based qubits, leveraging the quantum states of lattice vibrations in materials to store and process information. These qubits can be entangled and manipulated using ultra-precise acoustic pulses, forming the basis for ultrasonic quantum networks. The implications for battlefield communication are profound: these systems could support unbreakable, quantum-secure communication channels immune to both classical and quantum computing attacks. Unlike conventional photonic systems, ultrasonic qubits may offer advantages in terms of thermal stability, miniaturization, and integration with mechanical and biological systems—making them ideal for field-deployable secure nodes and embedded cryptographic modules in future military infrastructure.
As these technologies mature, they signal a shift in warfare toward multi-domain dominance, where control over electromagnetic, acoustic, cognitive, and quantum spaces becomes as important as traditional kinetic superiority. The battlefield of the future will no longer be defined solely by visible firepower but also by silent precision, neural influence, and untraceable data flows—all traveling through mediums once thought impossible for tactical use. As nations race to develop these capabilities, the line between weapon and communication device, between therapy and control, will blur—demanding not just innovation, but also accountability.
These developments, however, raise complex ethical questions. Should non-lethal acoustic weapons be regulated under the Geneva Protocol? How can democracies prevent authoritarian regimes from weaponizing ultrasonic surveillance beacons for domestic control? These are questions the global community must address as the acoustic domain becomes militarized.
Conclusion: The Ultrasonic Arms Race
Ultrasonic technology is a double-edged sword—its unique physical characteristics empower secure, low-profile communication systems and advanced directed-energy weapons, while also introducing stealthy vectors for surveillance and sabotage. As the defense and security sectors accelerate investment in technologies like saser arrays and quantum sonar, the imperative to develop robust countermeasures grows equally urgent. Future conflict zones may not ring with explosions or buzz with RF chatter; instead, they may be orchestrated silently in frequencies far above human perception. In this emerging acoustic battlefield, victory will belong to those who master both the signal and the medium through which it travels.
