Multiple Access and Routing for LEO Satellite Constellations: Unlocking Efficient Communication

Related Articles

Maximizing Performance and Minimizing Costs: The Role of Satellite Constellation Modeling & Simulation

2 days ago

Revolutionizing the Satellite Ground Segment: The Rise of Ground Segment as a Service (GSaaS) in the New Space Era

4 days ago

The Military Antenna Market: Powering Communication, Radars and EW on the Battlefield

6 days ago

The advent of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations has revolutionized the satellite communication landscape, offering unprecedented global coverage, low latency, and high-speed data transfer. Central to the success of these constellations are the sophisticated techniques of multiple access and routing. This article delves into the intricacies of these mechanisms and their crucial role in optimizing the performance and efficiency of LEO satellite networks.

Challenges of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations

Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellations, positioned within the range of 300 to 3000 kilometers above Earth’s surface, present a unique set of challenges stemming from their proximity to our planet. These satellites boast lower propagation delays and losses, along with higher Doppler shifts compared to their Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) counterparts. Consequently, robust transmitter-receiver architectures capable of mitigating Doppler effects become imperative for the seamless operation of LEO deployments. However, the dynamic nature of LEO orbits, characterized by orbital velocities of up to 7.8 kilometers per second and orbital periods as short as 100 minutes, poses significant obstacles. This rapid motion results in brief visibility windows for ground stations, typically spanning only 15 to 20 minutes, necessitating swift and precise data acquisition strategies for remote sensing satellites.

Furthermore, the atmospheric drag experienced by satellites in low Earth orbits introduces additional complexities to their operation. As these satellites traverse the upper layers of Earth’s atmosphere, friction with gases leads to a gradual reduction in velocity and altitude. Consequently, the angular velocity of LEO satellites fluctuates over time, requiring sophisticated orbit maintenance mechanisms to ensure stable operation. Amidst these challenges, the demand for reliable communication with higher data rates continues to surge, driven by advancements in spacecraft payloads. Yet, the limited frequency bands available for LEO communication pose significant hurdles to achieving these elevated data rates. Thus, while striving for enhanced performance, prioritizing the reliability and robustness of communication links remains paramount, emphasizing the need for resilient systems capable of delivering high data rates without compromising on stability and dependability.

Multiple Access in LEO Constellations

Multiple access refers to the method by which multiple users share the same spectrum and network resources simultaneously. In the context of LEO satellite constellations, this is particularly challenging due to the dynamic nature of the satellites’ orbits, the need for frequent handovers, and the varying signal quality as satellites move relative to the Earth’s surface.

Key Multiple Access Techniques

1. Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA):
   • Mechanism: TDMA divides the available bandwidth into time slots, with each user allocated specific time slots for communication.
   • Advantage: Efficient in managing bandwidth and minimizing interference.
   • Challenge: Requires precise synchronization due to the high velocity of LEO satellites.
2. Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA):
   • Mechanism: FDMA assigns different frequency bands to different users.
   • Advantage: Simple and effective for managing spectrum.
   • Challenge: Limited by the available frequency spectrum and can suffer from frequency reuse issues.
3. Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA):
   • Mechanism: CDMA uses unique codes for each user, allowing multiple users to share the same frequency band.
   • Advantage: Robust against interference and capable of supporting a high number of users.
   • Challenge: Complex implementation and requires advanced signal processing.
4. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA):
   • Mechanism: OFDMA divides the spectrum into orthogonal sub-carriers, assigning subsets of these sub-carriers to individual users.
   • Advantage: Highly efficient and flexible in handling variable data rates.
   • Challenge: Requires complex transmitter and receiver designs.
5. Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA):
6. • • Advanced Signal Processing Techniques: Researchers are exploring advanced signal processing methods to improve user separation and signal decoding accuracy in NOMA systems for LEO constellations. This will enable even higher capacity and better support for diverse user demands.
     • Integration with Machine Learning: Machine learning algorithms are being investigated to dynamically adjust NOMA power allocation based on real-time traffic conditions and user priorities. This will optimize resource utilization and ensure fairness among users.
7. Random Access Techniques: Traditional random access methods, where users contend for access to the channel, can be inefficient in LEO constellations due to high dynamics. New research is focusing on:

• • • Slotted Aloha with Successive Refinement: This approach uses multiple rounds of transmission to reduce collisions and improve access efficiency.
    • Grant-based Random Access: Satellites can allocate dedicated access slots to users based on their needs, reducing contention and improving predictability.

MF-TDMA: Combines frequency and time division access to dynamically allocate resources, maximizing bandwidth utilization while adapting to changing traffic demands.

MF-TDMA (Multi-Frequency, Time Division Multiple Access) stands at the forefront of satellite communication technologies, enabling dynamic bandwidth sharing in two-way communications networks. This method combines the principles of FDMA and TDMA, dividing the frequency band of a transponder into multiple carriers, each operating in a narrow-band TDMA mode. Consequently, each frequency channel is further partitioned into timeslots, serving as the resource allocated to individual connections based on their quality-of-service (QoS) requirements.

In an MF-TDMA satellite system, terminals initiate communication by sending connection requests, which are supported through the allocation of shared resources managed by the satellite. These resources are organized into bursts, consisting of contiguous timeslots over which terminals transmit data. Clock synchronization plays a pivotal role in this communication system, ensuring precise coordination among terminals. This technology dominates satellite networks due to its ability to provide significant bandwidth, optimal efficiency, and high service quality, facilitating dynamic bandwidth sharing among tens of thousands of transmitters in various communication modes, including star, fully meshed, or partially meshed topologies.

ST Engineering iDirect recently achieved a significant milestone by successfully conducting the first Over-the-Air (OTA) testing of MF-TDMA return link on the Telesat Phase-1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite. This accomplishment demonstrated the dynamic sharing of bandwidth among multiple terminals within a LEO constellation, enhancing the capacity and flexibility of Telesat’s multi-beam beam hopping architecture. The successful testing, conducted at Telesat’s Allan Park facility, showcased the robustness of MF-TDMA in compensating for LEO satellite link dynamics, including time, frequency, signal variation, and Doppler effects. The ability to efficiently share bandwidth on satellite ground-to-space links promises improved capacity, performance, and affordability for broadband services delivered over LEO satellite constellations, catering to a wide range of commercial, government, and defense applications

Mx-DMA MRC (Multi-Resolution Coding): A game-changer in return link technology, offering unprecedented service agility and efficiency by seamlessly adapting to varying terminal requirements and traffic profiles

MRC Mx-DMA (Multi-Resolution Coding and Multi-Carrier Demand Assignment Multiple Access) represents a breakthrough in satellite return link technology, offering unparalleled versatility and efficiency in managing diverse traffic profiles and terminal requirements within a shared bandwidth pool. In a Satellite Return Link (RTN), where thousands of terminals ranging from low-cost IoT devices to high-throughput cruise ships access a single gateway through a satellite transponder, the challenge lies in optimizing bandwidth utilization while accommodating varying terminal specifications and traffic demands.

The MRC Mx-DMA technology addresses this challenge by introducing Multi-Resolution Coding (MRC), a novel approach that allows for the demodulation of any combination of terminal transmissions on a single Multi-Carrier Demodulator (MCD). This ensures efficient resource allocation without compromising transmission efficiency or spectral utilization. The MRC waveform optimizes spectral efficiency across all traffic conditions while minimizing system jitter, thereby offering seamless adaptability to changing link conditions and traffic demands.

Key innovations of Mx-DMA MRC include scalable demodulator technology, high-resolution bandwidth allocation, adaptive payload length, and automatic regrowth control, all of which contribute to maximizing spectral efficiency, minimizing latency and jitter, and reducing hardware requirements at the hub. With the ability to dynamically adjust frequency plans, symbol rates, transmission lengths, and power levels in real-time based on traffic demand and link conditions, Mx-DMA MRC ensures optimal resource utilization and service agility across a wide range of applications, from broadband access to SCADA systems.

By combining the benefits of MF-TDMA and Mx-DMA HRC into a single return technology, Mx-DMA MRC offers service providers unprecedented flexibility and scalability while achieving SCPC-like efficiency levels. This allows for the efficient sharing of satellite capacity over a diverse set of terminals and applications, ultimately reducing operational complexity, maximizing network availability, and minimizing total cost of ownership. With its real-time self-optimization capabilities and high efficiency, Mx-DMA MRC sets a new standard for satellite return link technologies, enabling superior performance and cost savings across various use cases and market segments

Routing Challenges and Solutions

Routing in LEO satellite networks involves determining the optimal path for data packets from source to destination. Due to their low altitudes, typically ranging from 700 to 1400 kilometers above Earth’s surface, LEO satellites exhibit rapid mobility, hurtling through space at speeds exceeding 25,000 kilometers per hour. With visibility windows lasting only a few minutes before a handover to another satellite occurs, this swift movement presents a dynamic challenge for satellite networks. As satellites traverse their orbits, they engender a constantly shifting network topology, posing intricate routing issues for the networking layer.

Traditional terrestrial Internet routing protocols, like Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Routing Information Protocol (RIP), rely on the exchange of static topology information to establish and modify network connections. However, in LEO constellations, where satellites rapidly traverse diverse orbital paths, maintaining up-to-date topology information becomes an incessant endeavor. The need for continuous refreshment of this information introduces significant overhead, complicating the role of satellites as conventional Internet routers.

The key challenges include the dynamic topology, frequent handovers, and latency considerations.

Routing algorithms consider factors like:

• Satellite positions: Knowing where each satellite is allows the system to choose the best path for data to travel.
• User locations: Data needs to be directed towards the user’s location, so the system must factor in the user’s position.
• Predicted traffic patterns: Just like traffic congestion on roads, constellations can experience peak usage times. Routing algorithms consider these patterns to avoid bottlenecks and ensure smooth data flow.

Key Routing Strategies

1. Static Routing:
   • Mechanism: Predefined routes based on predicted satellite positions.
   • Advantage: Simple to implement.
   • Challenge: Inefficient due to the dynamic nature of LEO constellations.
2. Dynamic Routing: LEO constellations are constantly changing as satellites move in their orbits. Routing protocols need to adapt in real-time to these changes. This ensures data packets take the most efficient path at any given moment, minimizing delays and dropped connections.
   • Mechanism: Routes are dynamically adjusted based on real-time satellite positions and network conditions.
   • Advantage: Adapts to changing network topologies and improves efficiency.
   • Challenge: Requires continuous monitoring and complex algorithms.
3. Predictive Routing:
   • Mechanism: Uses predictive models to estimate future satellite positions and optimize routing decisions.
   • Advantage: Balances simplicity and adaptability.
   • Challenge: Dependent on the accuracy of predictive models.
4. Hierarchical Routing:
   • Mechanism: Divides the network into hierarchical layers, simplifying routing decisions at each layer.
   • Advantage: Reduces the complexity of routing in large networks.
   • Challenge: Requires efficient coordination between layers.

Examples of Routing Protocols:

• Minimum hop routing: Aims to get data to its destination with the fewest “hops” (transfers) between satellites.
• Delay-constrained routing: Prioritizes paths with the lowest latency to meet specific user requirements (e.g., real-time video calls).

Strategies reliant on topology leverage proprietary routing protocols equipped with intricate understanding of the constellation’s layout and satellite mobility. These protocols demand the constant availability of a communication path between any two ground hosts and ensure routing remains free of loops.

Tailored to the specifics of particular constellation designs, each proprietary protocol is finely tuned to optimize performance. An example of such a protocol is the Footprint Handover Routing Protocol, designed specifically for polar Walker star constellations. This protocol exemplifies the custom approach taken to address the unique routing challenges posed by different constellation architectures

Virtual node concept

The virtual node concept capitalizes on the predictable nature of a constellation’s layout to streamline routing protocols amidst the mobility of satellites. Its objective is to shield routing protocols from the intricacies of satellite movement within the constellation. In this framework, information pertinent to terrestrial users and their communication pathways is encapsulated in a static state relative to Earth’s surface.

Users within the constellation interact with this abstract entity, known as the virtual node, which encapsulates their specific routing details. At any given moment, a satellite embodies this virtual node, forming a virtual network comprising these nodes across the constellation. As satellites traverse their orbits and users undergo handovers, critical state information, such as routing table entries and channel allocations, seamlessly transfers from one satellite to another. Routing operations occur within this fixed virtual network, facilitated by a shared routing protocol.

New Routing Concepts

• Software-Defined Networking (SDN): The concept of SDN, where network control logic is separated from physical infrastructure, is being explored for LEO constellations. This allows for more flexible and programmable routing decisions based on real-time network conditions.
• Constellation-aware Routing Protocols: New routing protocols are being developed that specifically consider the unique characteristics of LEO constellations, such as satellite mobility, inter-satellite links (ISLs), and varying user traffic patterns. These protocols aim to optimize data flow by considering factors like:
  • Satellite-to-satellite link quality: Routing algorithms can prioritize paths with strong ISLs to minimize reliance on ground stations and reduce latency.
  • Energy Efficiency: Routing protocols can be designed to consider the energy consumption of satellites when choosing paths, extending the constellation’s operational lifespan.

Integrated Multiple Access and Routing Strategies

For optimal performance, LEO satellite constellations often integrate multiple access and routing strategies. Here are a few integrated approaches:

1. Cross-Layer Design:
   • Mechanism: Simultaneously optimizes multiple layers of the network stack (e.g., physical, MAC, and network layers).
   • Advantage: Holistic optimization leads to significant performance gains.
   • Challenge: Increased complexity in design and implementation.
2. Quality of Service (QoS) Routing:
   • Mechanism: Prioritizes routing decisions based on QoS requirements such as latency, bandwidth, and reliability.
   • Advantage: Ensures that critical applications receive the necessary resources.
   • Challenge: Balancing QoS requirements with overall network efficiency.
3. Load Balancing:
   • Mechanism: Distributes traffic evenly across the network to prevent congestion and optimize resource utilization.
   • Advantage: Enhances network performance and prevents bottlenecks.
   • Challenge: Requires real-time monitoring and adaptive algorithms.

Future Trends and Innovations

The field of multiple access and routing for LEO satellite constellations is rapidly evolving. Emerging trends include:

• Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Leveraging AI and ML to predict network conditions, optimize routing, and dynamically allocate resources.
• Blockchain Technology: Using blockchain for secure and efficient decentralized routing decisions.
• Quantum Communication: Exploring quantum communication techniques for ultra-secure and high-speed data transfer.

Integration and Collaboration:

• Inter-Constellation Connectivity: Research is underway on establishing communication links between different LEO constellations. This would allow for data exchange and resource sharing, potentially leading to wider coverage and improved service resilience.
• Joint Network Optimization: Collaboration between LEO constellation operators and terrestrial network providers is crucial for seamless integration and efficient network resource utilization. This could involve joint routing strategies and dynamic spectrum management to avoid interference and optimize overall network performance.

Conclusion

Multiple access and routing are fundamental to the efficient operation of LEO satellite constellations. By employing advanced techniques and integrated strategies, satellite networks can achieve high performance, reliability, and scalability. As technology continues to advance, the potential for optimizing these networks will only grow, unlocking new possibilities for global communication and connectivity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References and Resources also include:

https://www.idirect.net/news/st-engineering-idirect-achieves-worlds-first-live-mf-tdma-demo-on-telesat-leo-satellite/