International Defense Security & Technology Your trusted Source for News, Research and Analysis
Related Articles
As the space industry shifts toward smaller, more agile satellites, traditional propulsion systems often fall short of meeting the demands of precision, efficiency, and scalability. A breakthrough technology is emerging to fill this gap: electrospray thrusters. Compact yet powerful, these devices are redefining what’s possible in satellite propulsion, offering unprecedented levels of efficiency and control for the rapidly expanding small satellite market.
In this article, we’ll explore how electrospray thrusters work, why they stand out among propulsion technologies, and how they are enabling small satellites to take on increasingly ambitious roles in the future of space exploration.
Introduction
Small satellites have transformed space exploration by making spacecraft smaller, cheaper, and more accessible. These compact platforms have become indispensable for Earth observation, scientific research, and technology demonstrations. Yet despite their versatility, small satellites face a major limitation: propulsion. Constrained by size, mass, and power, most small satellites have historically struggled with orbital maneuvering, collision avoidance, or extended mission lifetimes.
That bottleneck is now beginning to shift. Advances in miniaturized propulsion systems, particularly electrospray thrusters, are unlocking new possibilities for small satellites. By providing precise, efficient thrust in a package compact enough for satellites the size of a shoebox, electrosprays enable orbit changes, station-keeping, formation flying, and even deep-space navigation.
Already, their promise is moving beyond the lab and into orbit. NASA’s EQUiSat and iSat missions, for instance, have demonstrated electrospray technology in small satellites, while private companies like Accion Systems are deploying them commercially on CubeSats and microsatellites. These early successes signal that electrospray propulsion is not just experimental—it’s becoming a practical enabler for the next wave of space missions.
What Are Electrospray Thrusters?
Electrospray thrusters operate on a simple but elegant principle. Instead of igniting chemical propellants or heating gases, they use strong electric fields to accelerate charged particles—typically ions—from a liquid propellant. This process produces extremely fine and efficient thrust, enabling spacecraft to carry out orbital adjustments and station-keeping with minimal fuel consumption. The result is a propulsion system that is lightweight, scalable, and ideally suited for CubeSats, microsatellites, and other small spacecraft.
How Electrospray Differs from Ion Thrusters
To understand their significance, it helps to compare electrosprays with the more familiar ion thrusters used on larger spacecraft. Ion thrusters typically rely on bulky gas-storage systems, high-voltage grids, and complex neutralizers, making them efficient but heavy and challenging to miniaturize. Electrospray thrusters, by contrast, use liquid propellants—such as ionic liquids—that can be stored at room temperature without pressurization. They generate thrust directly from the liquid surface, eliminating the need for many supporting subsystems. The result is a simpler, more compact design that delivers efficiency without the size and complexity.
Why Electrospray Stands Out
The efficiency of electrospray propulsion is one of its greatest advantages. By using propellant with extraordinary economy, these thrusters allow satellites to extend their operational lifetimes, carry more payload instead of fuel, and perform orbital maneuvers that were once impossible for spacecraft of their size.
Equally important is their precision. Electrospray thrusters can make extremely fine adjustments in thrust, giving satellites the ability to maintain stable orbits, compensate for drag, or conduct delicate operations such as formation flying. This precision is crucial for enabling satellite constellations and advanced Earth observation missions.
Another strength lies in their modularity. Multiple electrospray units can be clustered to scale thrust without redesigning the core system, making them adaptable across a wide range of missions and satellite sizes. This scalability, combined with their efficiency and precision, makes them a leading propulsion option for next-generation small spacecraft.
Key Applications
Electrospray thrusters expand the operational envelope of small satellites, enabling missions that were once reserved for larger and more expensive spacecraft. One of the most immediate benefits is in orbital adjustments, where electrosprays provide the precision and efficiency required to transition seamlessly between low Earth orbit (LEO), medium Earth orbit (MEO), and even geostationary orbit (GEO). For example, NASA’s Dellingr CubeSat demonstrated the growing need for propulsion in extended science missions, where electrosprays could provide the fine orbital control required for multi-year operations.
Another critical application lies in constellation deployment and maintenance. As networks like SpaceX’s Starlink and OneWeb expand, maintaining precise satellite alignments becomes indispensable for uninterrupted coverage and performance. Electrospray thrusters enable small satellites to fine-tune their positions, maximize system efficiency, and reduce the need for frequent replacements. DARPA’s Blackjack program, which is exploring large proliferated constellations for defense applications, also highlights how miniaturized propulsion will be central to managing resilient satellite architectures.
Electrosprays are also crucial for space sustainability, addressing the growing challenge of orbital debris. With their ability to execute collision-avoidance maneuvers, they help protect assets in crowded orbits such as LEO. At the end of missions, electrosprays can conduct controlled deorbiting to ensure satellites burn up safely in Earth’s atmosphere. The ESA’s RemoveDEBRIS mission demonstrated technologies for tackling orbital debris, and electrosprays could significantly enhance such efforts by providing reliable end-of-life deorbit capabilities.
Finally, electrospray propulsion holds particular promise for national security missions. Compact, efficient thrusters allow small satellites to reposition rapidly, rendezvous with other spacecraft, or conduct close inspection missions. Programs such as the U.S. Space Force’s X-SAT and Tetra satellites underscore the importance of responsive and tactical space assets. With electrosprays, small satellites gain the ability to support intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations while remaining highly maneuverable in contested orbital environments.
Leading Developments and Players
Several organizations are driving electrospray propulsion forward. Accion Systems, a Boston-based startup, has pioneered its TILE (Tiled Ionic Liquid Electrospray) technology, which offers scalable thrust for CubeSats and microsatellites. Their thrusters are already in orbit, demonstrating both durability and precision in real-world conditions. European efforts are also notable, with the European Space Agency (ESA) supporting electrospray development through initiatives like the GRACE program, which focuses on propulsion for small satellites.
Academic institutions have played a pivotal role as well. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has been instrumental in the development of ionic liquid electrosprays, while collaborations between universities and startups worldwide are accelerating commercialization. With private funding and government support converging, the technology is moving rapidly from lab benches to orbit.
Challenges and the Road Ahead
Despite their transformative potential, electrospray thrusters are not without hurdles. One of the most pressing challenges lies in scaling the technology. While highly effective for small satellites, delivering higher thrust levels for larger spacecraft requires meticulous engineering to maintain stability, avoid plume divergence, and prevent degradation of emitter components. Longevity is equally critical: electrodes must endure years of continuous operation in the harsh radiation, thermal, and vacuum conditions of space without clogging, erosion, or performance decay.
Integration also poses significant difficulties. Power processing units (PPUs) and propellant feed systems must be miniaturized to fit within the tight constraints of small satellite buses, all while maintaining efficiency and reliability. The balance between compactness and performance remains a key engineering trade-off. Beyond the hardware, interoperability and standardization are still evolving. With multiple vendors developing their own electrospray architectures, ensuring compatibility across platforms and building robust flight heritage will be essential for wider adoption.
Regulatory and market pressures add another layer of complexity. As more satellites adopt advanced propulsion systems, space agencies and operators must ensure compliance with orbital debris mitigation standards, collision avoidance protocols, and spectrum of international norms. The commercial race to deploy mega-constellations only intensifies these concerns, making propulsion reliability and predictability a strategic priority.
Encouragingly, the industry is responding with rapid innovation. Research into nanomaterials, advanced propellant chemistries, and multi-emitter array designs is steadily improving both performance and durability. Successful demonstrations, such as NASA’s Lunar IceCube and commercial deployments by Astra’s Space Mobility and Accion Systems, are building confidence and flight heritage. These milestones highlight electrosprays as more than an experimental niche—they are maturing into a cornerstone of the propulsion toolkit for next-generation space missions.
The trajectory is clear. As demand for precise station-keeping, constellation management, and deep-space navigation continues to grow, electrospray thrusters are poised to become a staple propulsion choice. Their efficiency, adaptability, and scalability make them not just an enabling technology, but a driving force in shaping the sustainable and agile future of small satellite missions.
Conclusion: Propelling the Future of Small Spacecraft
Electrospray thrusters represent far more than just an incremental advance in propulsion—they are a transformative technology reshaping the capabilities of small satellites. By delivering high delta-V performance in a compact, power-efficient package, they allow spacecraft once limited to passive observation or short-lived missions to actively maneuver, reposition, and even explore beyond Earth’s orbit. This shift unlocks new possibilities in communications, Earth science, security, and interplanetary research, firmly positioning small satellites as versatile players in the broader space economy.
For satellite designers and mission planners, the implications are profound. Electrospray thrusters provide not only a path to greater mission flexibility but also a way to extend satellite lifetimes, protect valuable constellations, and contribute to sustainable space operations through controlled deorbiting. Their adaptability ensures that as satellite architectures evolve—whether for large-scale constellations in low Earth orbit or exploratory missions to the Moon and beyond—these systems will remain at the forefront of propulsion solutions.
The message is clear: the future of small satellites lies in precise, scalable, and efficient propulsion. Electrospray thrusters are not just enabling today’s missions—they are laying the foundation for tomorrow’s space economy.
